Suppr超能文献

计划性腹疝。急性腹壁缺损的分期管理。

Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects.

作者信息

Fabian T C, Croce M A, Pritchard F E, Minard G, Hickerson W L, Howell R L, Schurr M J, Kudsk K A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 1994 Jun;219(6):643-50; discussion 651-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199406000-00007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of a staged management scheme for initial and definitive management of acute abdominal wall defects is provided.

METHODS

A four-staged scheme for managing acute abdominal wall defects consists of the following stages: stage I--prosthetic insertion; stage II--2 to 3 weeks after prosthetic insertion and wound granulation, the prosthesis is removed; stage III--2 to 3 days later, planned ventral hernia (split thickness skin graft [STSG] or full-thickness skin and subcutaneous fat); stage IV--6 to 12 months later, definitive reconstruction. Cases were evaluated retrospectively for benefits and risks of the techniques employed.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight cases (39 visceral edema, 27 abdominal sepsis, 22 abdominal wall resection) were managed during 8.5 years. Prostheses included polypropylene mesh in 45 cases, polyglactin 910 mesh in 27, polytetrafluorethylene in 10, and plastic in 6. Twenty-four patients died from their initial disease. The fistula rates associated with prosthetic management was 9%; no wound-related mortality occurred. Most wounds had split thickness skin graft applied after prosthetic removal. Definitive reconstruction was undertaken in 21 patients in the authors' institution (prosthetic mesh in 12 and modified components separation in 9). Recurrent hernias developed in 33% of mesh reconstructions and 11% of the components separation technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors concluded that 1) this staged approach was associated with low morbidity and no technique-related mortality; 2) prostheses placed for edema were removed with fascial approximation accomplished in half of those cases; 3) absorbable mesh provided the advantages of reasonable durability, ease of removal, and relatively low cost--it has become the prosthesis of choice; and 4) the modified components separation technique of reconstruction provided good results in patients with moderate sized defects.

摘要

目的

提供一种用于急性腹壁缺损初始和最终处理的分期管理方案。

方法

一种用于处理急性腹壁缺损的四阶段方案包括以下阶段:第一阶段——置入假体;第二阶段——假体置入及伤口肉芽形成2至3周后,移除假体;第三阶段——2至3天后,计划性腹疝修补(采用中厚皮片移植[STSG]或全厚皮肤及皮下脂肪);第四阶段——6至12个月后,进行最终重建。对病例进行回顾性评估,以分析所采用技术的益处和风险。

结果

在8.5年期间共处理了88例病例(39例内脏水肿、27例腹部脓毒症、22例腹壁切除)。使用的假体包括45例聚丙烯网片、27例聚乙醇酸910网片、10例聚四氟乙烯和6例塑料制品。24例患者死于原发病。假体处理相关的瘘管发生率为9%;未发生与伤口相关的死亡。大多数伤口在移除假体后采用了中厚皮片移植。作者所在机构对21例患者进行了最终重建(12例采用假体网片,9例采用改良的成分分离法)。网片重建的复发性疝发生率为33%,成分分离技术的复发性疝发生率为11%。

结论

作者得出结论:1)这种分期方法发病率低,且无技术相关的死亡;2)因水肿而置入的假体,半数病例在移除时实现了筋膜对合;3)可吸收网片具有耐久性合理、易于移除且成本相对较低的优点——已成为首选假体;4)改良的成分分离重建技术在中等大小缺损的患者中取得了良好效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83f/1243212/4e9a4ae02b20/annsurg00064-0071-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验