• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Diffusion of new technologies to treat renal stones in Australia.

作者信息

Hirsch N A

机构信息

Health Technology Division, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.

出版信息

Aust J Public Health. 1993 Dec;17(4):384-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00174.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00174.x
PMID:8204723
Abstract

Several new therapies for treating renal stones developed since the 1980s have considerably reduced the use of open surgery and endoscopy for this condition. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has made the biggest impact. Assessment of ESWL in the early stages of its development assisted in rational introduction of the technology in Australia. However, this effect was short-lived and Australia would now appear to have a significant overcapacity in this technology. Use of ESWL in recent years indicates that distance is a major factor in reducing access to this technology. These observations raise several issues that need addressing, including the limited ability to avoid inappropriate proliferation of a technology, uneven distribution of ESWL units, difficulties of access and the effects of overcapacity upon indications and upon the cost-effectiveness of a technology.

摘要

相似文献

1
Diffusion of new technologies to treat renal stones in Australia.
Aust J Public Health. 1993 Dec;17(4):384-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00174.x.
2
Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.开放手术、经皮肾镜取石术和体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的比较。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Mar 29;292(6524):879-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6524.879.
3
Kidney stones and lithotripters: critical analysis of the introduction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy into Canada.肾结石与碎石机:对体外冲击波碎石术引入加拿大的批判性分析
CMAJ. 1990 Dec 15;143(12):1299-303.
4
Experience with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗尿路结石的经验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 1994;26(6):599-604. doi: 10.1007/BF02767711.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
6
Contribution of modern lithotripsy to the practice of urology.
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Mar-Apr;22(3-4):237-40.
7
[Development of the indications for extra-corporeal lithotripsy and the impact of organizational methods on the indications].[体外冲击波碎石术适应症的发展及组织方法对适应症的影响]
Ann Urol (Paris). 1989;23(6):470-5.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal stones. To what size is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone feasible?体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型肾结石。单纯体外冲击波碎石术可行的结石最大尺寸是多少?
Eur Urol. 1988;15(1-2):5-8. doi: 10.1159/000473384.
9
[Monotherapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral stones].体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾及输尿管结石的单一疗法
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Oct;83(10):1586-92. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.83.1586.
10
Abruptly changing patterns of diffusion and use of extracorporeal shock-wave renal lithotripsy.体外冲击波肾碎石术的扩散和使用模式突然改变。
Am J Kidney Dis. 1991 Jul;18(1):103-7. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80298-8.

引用本文的文献

1
How has extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy changed the treatment of urinary stones in Quebec?体外冲击波碎石术如何改变了魁北克省尿路结石的治疗方式?
CMAJ. 1995 Dec 15;153(12):1729-36.