Shiota T, Jones M, Teien D E, Yamada I, Passafini A, Ge S, Shandas R, Valdes-Cruz L M, Sahn D J
Clinical Care Center for Congenital Heart Disease, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201-3098.
Circulation. 1994 Jun;89(6):2879-87. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.6.2879.
The imaging and measurement of the proximal flow convergence region in the left ventricle have been reported to be useful for identifying the site of mitral regurgitation (MR) and for evaluating its severity. However, the application of this method has not gained general acceptance. There have been few in vivo studies with quantified reference standards for determining regurgitant volume, and those that have been reported used spectral Doppler standards and/or nonsimultaneously performed contrast ventriculography. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the proximal flow convergence centerline velocity-distance profile method applied to chronic MR resulting from flail mitral leaflets in an animal model in which regurgitant flow rates and regurgitant volumes were determined simultaneously with electromagnetic flow probes and flowmeters.
In six sheep, a total of 18 hemodynamically different states were obtained when the animals were restudied 6 months after surgical induction of MR produced by severing chordae tendineae to the anterior (three sheep) or posterior (three sheep) mitral leaflet. Echocardiographic studies with a Vingmed 750 were performed to obtain complete proximal axial flow acceleration velocity-distance profiles for each hemodynamic state. The color Doppler velocity data were directly transferred in digital format from the ultrasound instrumentation to a microcomputer. The severity of MR was assessed by the magnitude of the mitral regurgitant fraction determined using both mitral and aortic electromagnetic flow probes balanced against each other to yield regurgitant volume. MR was classified as grade I when the regurgitant fraction was < 20%, as grade II when it was 20% to 35%, and as grade III to IV when it was > 35%. Thus, of the 18 hemodynamic states, 4 (from two sheep) were grade I, 7 (from five sheep) were grade II, and 7 (from three sheep) were grade III to IV. All of the velocity-distance acceleration curves showed organized acceleration fields with highly significant correlations using multiplicative regression fits (y = a.x-b, r = .90 to .99, all P < .01). Grade III to IV MR resulted in rightward and upward shifts of the velocity-distance profile curves compared with those produced by grade II and grade I MR. All of the centerline velocity-distance profiles for grade III or IV regurgitation resided in a domain encompassed by velocities > 0.5 m/s at distances from the orifice > 0.6 cm; the profiles for grade I regurgitation resided in a domain encompassed by velocities < 0.3 m/s at distances from the orifice of < 0.45 cm. The profiles for grade II regurgitations resided in a domain between them. Regression analysis for the distance at which a velocity of 0.5 m/s was first reached bore a close relation to regurgitant fraction (r = .92, P < .0001) and peak regurgitant flow rate (r = .89, P < .0001). In addition, an equation for quantitatively correlating both a and b (coefficients from the multiplicative regression fits) with the peak regurgitant flow rate (Qpeak in L/min) was derived from stepwise regression analysis: Qpeak = 12a + 2.7b-2.4 (r = .96, P < .0001, SEE = .45 L/min).
In this study, using quantified MR volume, we demonstrate that the proximal flow convergence axial centerline velocity-distance profile method can be used for evaluating the severity of MR without any assumption about isovelocity surface shape geometry.
据报道,左心室近端血流汇聚区的成像和测量对于识别二尖瓣反流(MR)的部位及其严重程度评估很有用。然而,该方法的应用尚未得到广泛认可。关于确定反流容积的定量参考标准的体内研究很少,并且已报道的那些研究使用频谱多普勒标准和/或非同步进行的对比心室造影。本研究的目的是评估应用于动物模型中因连枷样二尖瓣叶导致的慢性MR的近端血流汇聚中心线速度-距离轮廓法,在该模型中,使用电磁流量探头和流量计同时测定反流流速和反流容积。
在6只绵羊中,通过切断前叶(3只绵羊)或后叶(3只绵羊)二尖瓣腱索诱导产生MR,在术后6个月对动物进行再次研究时,共获得18种血流动力学不同的状态。使用Vingmed 750进行超声心动图研究,以获取每种血流动力学状态下完整的近端轴向血流加速度速度-距离轮廓。彩色多普勒速度数据以数字格式直接从超声仪器传输到微型计算机。通过使用相互平衡的二尖瓣和主动脉电磁流量探头来测定反流容积,从而确定二尖瓣反流分数的大小,以此评估MR的严重程度。当反流分数<20%时,MR被分类为I级;当反流分数为20%至35%时,为II级;当反流分数>35%时,为III至IV级。因此,在18种血流动力学状态中,4种(来自2只绵羊)为I级,7种(来自5只绵羊)为II级,7种(来自3只绵羊)为III至IV级。所有速度-距离加速度曲线均显示出有组织的加速度场,使用乘法回归拟合具有高度显著的相关性(y = a.x - b,r = 0.90至0.99,所有P < 0.01)。与II级和I级MR相比,III至IV级MR导致速度-距离轮廓曲线向右上方移位。III或IV级反流的所有中心线速度-距离轮廓都位于距瓣口>0.6 cm处速度>0.5 m/s所包围的区域内;I级反流的轮廓位于距瓣口<0.45 cm处速度<0.3 m/s所包围的区域内。II级反流的轮廓位于它们之间。首次达到0.5 m/s速度时的距离的回归分析与反流分数(r = 0.92,P < 0.0001)和峰值反流流速(r = 0.89,P < 0.0001)密切相关。此外,通过逐步回归分析得出了一个将a和b(乘法回归拟合的系数)与峰值反流流速(Qpeak,单位为L/min)定量相关的方程:Qpeak = 12a + 2.7b - 2.4(r = 0.96,P < 0.0001,SEE = 0.45 L/min)。
在本研究中,使用定量的MR容积,我们证明近端血流汇聚轴向中心线速度-距离轮廓法可用于评估MR的严重程度,而无需对等速表面形状几何结构做任何假设。