Thomson A N
Department of General Practice, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Med Educ. 1994 Mar;28(2):146-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02535.x.
Examinations of competence which may affect career prospects require measures which are of high reliability, and which can be demonstrated to be valid. In a New Zealand summative postgraduate examination of competence in family practice the doctor-patient communication skills of candidates were assessed by nonmedically trained nominees of community organizations. The assessments were based on direct observation of the candidates' encounters with simulated patients. To estimate the reliability of the consumer examiner, after the examination the examiners re-scored a random selection of video-taped candidate encounters. The test-retest correlations of consumer scoring were demonstrated to be at a level consistent with adequate examination reliability (confidence interval 0.59-0.98). Consumers may be valuable as a resource for the training and assessment of the communication skills of medical practitioners.
可能影响职业前景的能力考核需要采用具有高可靠性且能证明其有效性的措施。在新西兰一项关于家庭医疗实践能力的总结性研究生考试中,社区组织中未经医学培训的提名者对考生的医患沟通技巧进行评估。评估基于对考生与模拟患者接触情况的直接观察。为评估消费者考官的可靠性,考试结束后,考官们对随机抽取的考生视频接触记录重新打分。结果表明,消费者打分的重测相关性处于与足够考试可靠性相符的水平(置信区间0.59 - 0.98)。消费者作为医疗从业者沟通技巧培训和评估的资源可能很有价值。