Schultz E, McCormick K M
Department of Anatomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1994;123:213-57. doi: 10.1007/BFb0030904.
Evidence now suggests that satellite cells constitute a class of myogenic cells that differ distinctly from other embryonic myoblasts. Satellite cells arise from somites and first appear as a distinct myoblast type well before birth. Satellite cells from different muscles cannot be functionally distinguished from one another and are able to provide nuclei to all fibers without regard to phenotype. Thus, it is difficult to ascribe any significant function to establishing or stabilizing fiber type, even during regeneration. Within a muscle, satellite cells exhibit marked heterogeneity with respect to their proliferative behavior. The satellite cell population on a fiber can be partitioned into those that function as stem cells and those which are readily available for fusion. Recent studies have shown that the cells are not simply spindle shaped, but are very diverse in their morphology and have multiple branches emanating from the poles of the cells. This finding is consistent with other studies indicating that the cells have the capacity for extensive migration within, and perhaps between, muscles. Complexity of cell shape usually reflects increased cytoplasmic volume and organelles including a well developed Golgi, and is usually associated with growing postnatal muscle or muscles undergoing some form of induced adaptive change or repair. The appearance of activated satellite cells suggests some function of the cells in the adaptive process through elaboration and secretion of a product. Significant advances have been made in determining the potential secretion products that satellite cells make. The manner in which satellite cell proliferative and fusion behavior is controlled has also been studied. There seems to be little doubt that cellcell coupling is not how satellite cells and myofibers communicate. Rather satellite cell regulation is through a number of potential growth factors that arise from a number of sources. Critical to the understanding of this form of control is to determine which of the many growth factors that can alter satellite cell behavior in vitro are at work in vivo. Little work has been done to determine what controls are at work after a regeneration response has been initiated. It seems likely that, after injury, growth factors are liberated through proteolytic activity and initiate an activation process whereby cells enter into a proliferative phase. After myofibers are formed, it also seems likely that satellite cell behavior is regulated through diffusible factors arising from the fibers rather than continuous control by circulating factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
目前有证据表明,卫星细胞构成了一类与其他胚胎成肌细胞明显不同的生肌细胞。卫星细胞起源于体节,早在出生前就作为一种独特的成肌细胞类型首次出现。来自不同肌肉的卫星细胞在功能上无法相互区分,并且能够为所有肌纤维提供细胞核,而不考虑其表型。因此,即使在再生过程中,也很难将任何显著功能归因于纤维类型的建立或稳定。在一块肌肉内,卫星细胞在增殖行为方面表现出明显的异质性。肌纤维上的卫星细胞群体可分为起干细胞作用的细胞和易于融合的细胞。最近的研究表明,这些细胞并非简单的纺锤形,而是形态多样,从细胞两极发出多个分支。这一发现与其他研究一致,这些研究表明细胞具有在肌肉内甚至可能在不同肌肉之间广泛迁移的能力。细胞形状的复杂性通常反映了细胞质体积和细胞器的增加,包括发育良好的高尔基体,并且通常与出生后生长的肌肉或经历某种形式诱导适应性变化或修复的肌肉有关。活化卫星细胞的出现表明这些细胞在适应性过程中通过合成和分泌某种产物发挥了一定作用。在确定卫星细胞产生的潜在分泌产物方面已经取得了重大进展。卫星细胞增殖和融合行为的控制方式也得到了研究。毫无疑问,细胞间耦合并非卫星细胞与肌纤维之间的通讯方式。相反,卫星细胞的调节是通过多种潜在的生长因子实现的,这些生长因子来自多个来源。理解这种控制形式的关键在于确定在体外能够改变卫星细胞行为的众多生长因子中,哪些在体内起作用。在确定再生反应启动后起作用的控制因素方面,几乎没有开展相关工作。受伤后,生长因子可能通过蛋白水解活性释放出来,并启动一个激活过程,使细胞进入增殖阶段。肌纤维形成后,卫星细胞的行为似乎也可能通过纤维产生的可扩散因子进行调节,而不是由循环因子持续控制。(摘要截选至400字)