Thomas E E, Roscoe D L, Book L, Bone B, Browne L, Mah V
Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Jun;101(6):742-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/101.6.742.
To design a rapid and efficient protocol for processing pediatric stool specimens, the authors used 434 specimens to evaluate two commercial latex assays to detect rotavirus (Meritec-Rotavirus and Rotalex) and one to detect adenovirus (Adenolex). Rotavirus latex assay results were compared with electron microscopic examination and adenovirus latex assay results with virus culture. Ninety-two specimens (21%) were positive for rotavirus and 28 (6.5%) for adenovirus; 5 (1%) had both viruses. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values for the three assays were, respectively, as follows: Meritec-Rotavirus (97%, 99%, 97%, 99%), Rotalex (91%, 99%, 94%, 98%), and Adenolex (46%, 99%, 77%, 97%). For primary rotavirus screening, the Meritec-Rotavirus and Rotalex latex assays offer a good alternative to electron microscopic examination. For primary adenovirus screening, the low sensitivity of the Adenolex latex assay precludes its use as a routine screen. Its excellent specificity, however, makes it a useful tool for culture confirmation.
为设计一种快速有效的儿科粪便标本处理方案,作者使用434份标本评估了两种用于检测轮状病毒的商用乳胶检测法(Meritec - 轮状病毒检测法和Rotalex检测法)以及一种用于检测腺病毒的检测法(Adenolex检测法)。将轮状病毒乳胶检测结果与电子显微镜检查结果进行比较,腺病毒乳胶检测结果与病毒培养结果进行比较。92份标本(21%)轮状病毒呈阳性,28份标本(6.5%)腺病毒呈阳性;5份标本(1%)同时感染两种病毒。三种检测法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别如下:Meritec - 轮状病毒检测法(97%、99%、97%、99%),Rotalex检测法(91%、99%、94%、98%),以及Adenolex检测法(46%、99%、77%、97%)。对于轮状病毒的初步筛查,Meritec - 轮状病毒检测法和Rotalex乳胶检测法是电子显微镜检查的良好替代方法。对于腺病毒的初步筛查,Adenolex乳胶检测法的低敏感性使其无法用作常规筛查。然而,其出色的特异性使其成为培养确认的有用工具。