• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论群体生物等效性与个体生物等效性

On population and individual bioequivalence.

作者信息

Schall R, Luus H G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, R.S.A.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1993 Jun 30;12(12):1109-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121202.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780121202
PMID:8210816
Abstract

In a traditional assessment of the bioequivalence of two formulations of a drug one compares the average bioavailability from the two formulations. Anderson and Hauck argued that in some situations it is not sufficient to demonstrate average bioequivalence, and they proposed a method for the assessment of what they called individual bioequivalence, which essentially is the comparison of the individual responses to the two drug formulations within subjects. In this paper we propose a unified strategy for the assessment of bioequivalence that encompasses new approaches to the assessment of both population bioequivalence, which is the comparison of the marginal or population distributions of bioavailabilities, and individual bioequivalence, which is the comparison of the conditional or within-subject distributions of bioavailabilities. The general idea is to use a comparison of the reference formulation to itself as the basis for the comparison of the test with the reference formulation. The new approaches overcome the main weakness of the current methods for the assessment of bioequivalence by considering the variability of bioavailabilities in addition to their means. The current methods for the assessment of bioequivalence, namely the conventional assessment of average bioequivalence and the proposal by Anderson and Hauck for the assessment of individual bioequivalence, emerge as special cases. One can evaluate the new bioequivalence criteria statistically by use of bootstrap confidence intervals.

摘要

在对一种药物的两种制剂进行生物等效性的传统评估中,人们会比较这两种制剂的平均生物利用度。安德森和豪克认为,在某些情况下,证明平均生物等效性是不够的,他们提出了一种评估所谓个体生物等效性的方法,该方法本质上是比较受试者体内对两种药物制剂的个体反应。在本文中,我们提出了一种评估生物等效性的统一策略,该策略包含了评估群体生物等效性和个体生物等效性的新方法,群体生物等效性是生物利用度的边际或总体分布的比较,个体生物等效性是生物利用度的条件或受试者内分布的比较。总体思路是将参比制剂与其自身的比较作为测试制剂与参比制剂比较的基础。这些新方法除了考虑生物利用度的均值外,还考虑了其变异性,克服了当前生物等效性评估方法的主要弱点。当前的生物等效性评估方法,即平均生物等效性的传统评估方法以及安德森和豪克提出的个体生物等效性评估方法,都成为了特殊情况。人们可以通过使用自助法置信区间对新的生物等效性标准进行统计学评估。

相似文献

1
On population and individual bioequivalence.论群体生物等效性与个体生物等效性
Stat Med. 1993 Jun 30;12(12):1109-24. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121202.
2
Assessment of individual and population bioequivalence using the probability that bioavailabilities are similar.利用生物利用度相似的概率评估个体和群体生物等效性。
Biometrics. 1995 Jun;51(2):615-26.
3
New bioequivalence studies: individual bioequivalence and population bioequivalence.新的生物等效性研究:个体生物等效性和群体生物等效性。
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2000 Nov;120(11):1201-8. doi: 10.1248/yakushi1947.120.11_1201.
4
On TIER method for assessment of individual bioequivalence.用于评估个体生物等效性的TIER方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Mar;7(1):63-85. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835170.
5
Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.生物等效性的类型及相关统计学考量
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992 May;30(5):181-7.
6
Tolerance intervals for assessing individual bioequivalence.用于评估个体生物等效性的容忍区间。
Stat Med. 1997 Apr 15;16(7):803-20. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<803::aid-sim499>3.0.co;2-3.
7
[Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials].[生物等效性试验决策规则的回顾与应用]
Therapie. 1993 Jan-Feb;48(1):15-22.
8
Individual bioequivalence: what matters to the patient.个体生物等效性:对患者重要的因素。
Stat Med. 1991 Jun;10(6):959; discussion 959-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100616.
9
Detection of outlying data in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies.生物利用度/生物等效性研究中异常数据的检测
Stat Med. 1991 Sep;10(9):1375-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100906.
10
An individual bioequivalence criterion: regulatory considerations.个体生物等效性标准:监管考量
Stat Med. 2000 Oct 30;19(20):2821-42. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001030)19:20<2821::aid-sim548>3.0.co;2-l.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing individual equivalence in parallel group and crossover designs: Exact test and sample size procedures.平行组和交叉设计中个体等效性的评估:精确检验和样本量程序。
PLoS One. 2022 May 27;17(5):e0269128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269128. eCollection 2022.
2
Equivalence Testing of Complex Particle Size Distribution Profiles Based on Earth Mover's Distance.基于推土机距离的复杂粒度分布轮廓的等效性测试。
AAPS J. 2018 Apr 12;20(3):62. doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0212-y.
3
Likelihood approach for evaluating bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.
评估高变异药物生物等效性的似然性方法。
Pharm Stat. 2015 Mar-Apr;14(2):82-94. doi: 10.1002/pst.1661. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
4
Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.定量成像生物标志物:计算机算法比较的统计方法综述
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Feb;24(1):68-106. doi: 10.1177/0962280214537390. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Random-effects linear modeling and sample size tables for two special crossover designs of average bioequivalence studies: the four-period, two-sequence, two-formulation and six-period, three-sequence, three-formulation designs.随机效应线性模型和两种特殊交叉设计平均生物等效性研究的样本量表:四周期、两序列、两制剂和六周期、三序列、三制剂设计。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Dec;52(12):1033-43. doi: 10.1007/s40262-013-0103-4.
6
Requirements for generic antiepileptic medicines: a clinical perspective.通用抗癫痫药物的需求:临床视角。
J Neurol. 2011 Dec;258(12):2128-32. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6126-6. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
7
Bioequivalence: tried and tested.生物等效性:久经考验。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010 Mar-Apr;21(2):69-71.
8
Estimation of coefficients of individual agreement (CIAs) for quantitative and binary data using SAS and R.使用 SAS 和 R 估算定量和二分类数据的个体一致性系数(CIAs)。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010 May;98(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
9
Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence.采用标化平均生物等效性评估高变异药物的生物等效性。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(11):725-43. doi: 10.2165/11318040-000000000-00000.
10
Evaluation of a scaling approach for the bioequivalence of highly variable drugs.高变异药物生物等效性的一种标度法评估
AAPS J. 2008 Sep;10(3):450-4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9053-4. Epub 2008 Aug 26.