Suppr超能文献

首次尸体移植且移植器官立即发挥功能时,四联疗法与三联疗法的前瞻性随机对照研究。

A prospective randomized comparison of quadruple versus triple therapy for first cadaver transplants with immediate function.

作者信息

Slakey D P, Johnson C P, Callaluce R D, Browne B J, Zhu Y R, Roza A M, Adams M B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1993 Oct;56(4):827-31. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00009.

Abstract

In January 1988, we initiated a prospective, randomized comparison of prophylactic antilymphoblast globulin (ALG; quadruple therapy) versus no prophylactic ALG (triple therapy) in the setting of immediate graft function (defined by a brisk diuresis and a 20% decline in serum creatinine within 24 hr). Recipients were stratified according to presence of diabetes and age greater or less than 50 years. Recipients on quadruple therapy (n = 61) received 7 days of prophylactic Minnesota ALG (5 mg/kg on day 1, 10 mg/kg on day 2, 20 mg/kg on days 3-7). CsA, 10 mg/kg/day, began on day 6. AZA began at 2.5 mg/kg/day and was adjusted according to white blood cell count. Recipients on triple therapy (n = 60) began immediate CsA, 10 mg/kg/day orally and AZA, 5 mg/kg/day, tapering to 2.5 mg/kg/day by day 8. Both groups received identical prednisone tapers beginning at 1 mg/kg/day, decreasing to 0.5 mg/kg/day by 2 weeks and to 0.15 mg/kg/day by 6 months. Demographic characteristics between groups were not different with respect to diabetes, age, sex, race, per cent panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), or HLA matching. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 4.5 years. Patient survival was 93% for the quadruple therapy group and 90% for triple therapy. Actuarial graft survival was 79% in the quadruple group and 72% in the triple group (P = 0.18). Graft loss due to rejection occurred in 6/61 receiving ALG versus 7/60 in the immediate CsA group. Three of 4 high PRA recipients in the immediate CsA group lost their grafts within 30 days compared with none in the ALG group. The mean time to graft loss was significantly longer for the quadruple therapy group (17 +/- 8 months) compared with the triple therapy group (4 +/- 5 months), P = 0.006. The total number of rejection episodes was similar for both groups (29/61 vs. 31/60), as was the number who were rejection free (51% vs. 47%). The use of OKT3 was also similar between groups (28% vs. 30%). The quadruple therapy group had a higher incidence of CMV infection: 20% vs. 7% (P < 0.05), but no grafts or patients were lost as a result. Serum Cr was not different at 1 and 12 months (1.5 and 1.6 vs. 1.6 and 1.7, respectively), nor were Cr clearances (63 and 68 vs. 60 and 63). Conclusion. Early initiation of oral CsA in the setting of immediate graft function is not associated with significant nephrotoxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

1988年1月,我们开展了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,比较在移植肾功能立即恢复(定义为术后24小时内尿量迅速增加且血清肌酐下降20%)的情况下,预防性使用抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG;四联疗法)与不使用预防性ALG(三联疗法)的效果。根据患者是否患有糖尿病以及年龄大于或小于50岁进行分层。接受四联疗法的患者(n = 61)接受7天的预防性明尼苏达ALG治疗(第1天5mg/kg,第2天10mg/kg,第3 - 7天20mg/kg)。环孢素A(CsA)从第6天开始使用,剂量为10mg/kg/天。硫唑嘌呤(AZA)起始剂量为2.5mg/kg/天,并根据白细胞计数进行调整。接受三联疗法的患者(n = 60)立即开始口服CsA,剂量为10mg/kg/天,以及AZA,5mg/kg/天,至第8天逐渐减至2.5mg/kg/天。两组患者均从1mg/kg/天开始使用相同的泼尼松递减方案,2周时减至0.5mg/kg/天,6个月时减至0.15mg/kg/天。两组患者在糖尿病、年龄、性别、种族、群体反应性抗体百分比(PRA)或HLA配型方面的人口统计学特征无差异。随访时间为2至4.5年。四联疗法组的患者生存率为93%,三联疗法组为90%。四联疗法组的移植肾 actuarial 生存率为79%,三联疗法组为72%(P = 0.18)。接受ALG治疗的61例患者中有6例因排斥反应导致移植肾丢失,而立即使用CsA组的60例患者中有7例。立即使用CsA组的4例高PRA受者中有3例在30天内移植肾丢失,而ALG组无此情况。四联疗法组移植肾丢失的平均时间(17±8个月)明显长于三联疗法组(4±5个月),P = 0.006。两组的排斥反应总次数相似(29/61对31/60),无排斥反应的患者比例也相似(51%对47%)。两组使用OKT3的情况也相似(28%对30%)。四联疗法组巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的发生率较高:20%对7%(P < 0.05),但未因此导致移植肾或患者丢失。1个月和12个月时血清肌酐无差异(分别为1.5和1.6对1.6和1.7),肌酐清除率也无差异(63和68对60和63)。结论:在移植肾功能立即恢复的情况下早期开始口服CsA与明显的肾毒性无关。(摘要截短至400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验