Suppr超能文献

一项比较环孢素与抗淋巴细胞球蛋白 - 硫唑嘌呤用于肾移植受者的随机试验。2.5至6年的结果。

A randomized trial comparing cyclosporine with antilymphoblast-globulin-azathioprine for renal allograft recipients. Results at 2 1/2-6 years.

作者信息

Johnson C P, Simmons R L, Sutherland D E, Canafax D M, Ascher N L, Payne W D, Flick B, Najarian J S, Fryd D S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Transplantation. 1988 Feb;45(2):380-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198802000-00027.

Abstract

Between September 1980 and June 1984, 246 splenectomized, transfused renal allograft recipients were stratified according to presence of diabetes and donor source, and randomized to treatment with either cyclosporine (CsA)-prednisone (pred) or antilymphoblast-globulin (ALG--azathioprine (AZA)--prednisone. As of August 1986, mean follow-up is 47 months. Over all, actuarial patient survival is 84% and 83%, respectively at 4 years. Corresponding graft survival is 70% and 63% for CsA-treated and ALG-AZA-treated patients (NS). Within the subgroup of diabetic recipients of cadaver grafts, graft survival is 70% for CsA-treated and 53% for ALG-AZA-treated recipients (P = .035). In the CsA group, 71% required either a significant reduction in CsA dosage with the addition of azathioprine or a complete switch to azathioprine, mainly because of CsA-associated nephrotoxicity. Of those CsA patients switched at a mean time of 21.3 +/- 16.4 months posttransplant with mean serum creatinine of 2.40 +/- .67, current serum creatinine is 1.79 +/- .63. Current mean serum creatinine values are significantly greater for patients randomized to CsA-pred (1.73 +/- .60) vs. ALG-AZA-pred (1.49 +/- .59), P = .014, even though most CsA-treated patients were eventually switched. The causes of graft loss are not different between CsA and ALG-AZA randomized patients. In nondiabetics, rejection is the most common cause of graft loss (17/33), whereas in diabetics loss due to complications from overimmunosuppression or death from cardiovascular events is significantly more common (27/44) than corresponding losses in nondiabetics (6/33, P less than .05). Switching does not seem to influence the incidence or cause of graft loss. Since most patients started on CsA-prednisone are ultimately switched to triple drug therapy, the latter is now the preferred initial treatment modality.

摘要

1980年9月至1984年6月期间,246例接受脾切除、输血的肾移植受者根据是否患有糖尿病和供体来源进行分层,并随机分为环孢素(CsA)-泼尼松(pred)治疗组或抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG)-硫唑嘌呤(AZA)-泼尼松治疗组。截至1986年8月,平均随访时间为47个月。总体而言,4年时患者的精算生存率分别为84%和83%。接受CsA治疗和ALG-AZA治疗患者的相应移植肾生存率分别为70%和63%(无显著性差异)。在尸体肾移植的糖尿病受者亚组中,接受CsA治疗的受者移植肾生存率为70%,接受ALG-AZA治疗的受者为53%(P = 0.035)。在CsA组中,71%的患者需要显著降低CsA剂量并加用硫唑嘌呤,或完全改用硫唑嘌呤,主要是因为CsA相关的肾毒性。那些在移植后平均21.3±16.4个月、平均血清肌酐为2.40±0.67时改用其他治疗的CsA患者,目前的血清肌酐为1.79±0.63。随机分配到CsA-pred组的患者目前的平均血清肌酐值(1.73±0.60)显著高于ALG-AZA-pred组(1.49±0.59),P = 0.014,尽管大多数接受CsA治疗的患者最终都改用了其他治疗。CsA组和ALG-AZA组随机分配患者的移植肾丢失原因没有差异。在非糖尿病患者中,排斥反应是移植肾丢失的最常见原因(17/33),而在糖尿病患者中,因免疫抑制过度并发症或心血管事件死亡导致的移植肾丢失明显比非糖尿病患者更常见(27/44)(非糖尿病患者为6/33,P < 0.05)。改用其他治疗似乎不影响移植肾丢失的发生率或原因。由于大多数开始接受CsA-泼尼松治疗的患者最终都改用了三联药物治疗,因此后者现在是首选的初始治疗方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验