Newstead C G, Lamb W R, Brenchley P E, Short C D
Renal Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom.
Transplantation. 1993 Oct;56(4):831-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199310000-00010.
The object of the study presented here was to test whether measurement of blood or urine IL-6 or TNF-alpha could discriminate between the most common causes of renal allograft dysfunction, thus avoiding a biopsy. We present data here in which serum and urine IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels were measured at the same time as a diagnostic renal biopsy was performed. TNF-alpha and IL-6 were measured by sandwich ELISA. Thirty patients had acute cellular rejection, 18 had acute tubular necrosis/CsA toxicity, and 9 had chronic vascular rejection. There was no difference in the levels of IL-6 measured in serum and urine among the three categories of graft dysfunction (t < 1.31; P > 0.20). A similar result with considerable overlap between the groups was seen with TNF-alpha (t < 0.78; P > 0.44). Stratifying the results according to the precise immunosuppressive therapy, CsA dose, body weight, CsA level, body temperature, serum creatinine, the number of previous rejection episodes, original cause of renal failure, or the time elapsed since the transplant did not alter the results. The ratio of serum IL-6 divided by trough CsA level was compared among the three groups and there was no significant difference among them (t < 1.79; P > 0.09). In the light of our results, we therefore suggest that previously published reports of the clinical value of serum and or urine IL-6 and or TNF-alpha in relatively small numbers of patients, not all of whom had been biopsied and in whom rigorous clinical and statistical criteria had not been met, should be viewed with caution.
本文所呈现研究的目的是测试血液或尿液中白细胞介素 -6(IL-6)或肿瘤坏死因子 -α(TNF-α)的检测能否区分同种异体肾移植功能障碍的最常见原因,从而避免进行活检。我们在此展示的数据是在进行诊断性肾活检的同时测量血清和尿液中IL-6和TNF-α水平的结果。TNF-α和IL-6通过夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行检测。30例患者发生急性细胞排斥反应,18例发生急性肾小管坏死/环孢素A(CsA)毒性反应,9例发生慢性血管排斥反应。在这三类移植功能障碍患者中,血清和尿液中检测到的IL-6水平没有差异(t < 1.31;P > 0.20)。TNF-α也得到了类似的结果,且各组之间有相当大的重叠(t < 0.78;P > 0.44)。根据精确的免疫抑制治疗、CsA剂量、体重、CsA水平、体温、血清肌酐、既往排斥反应发作次数、肾衰竭的原始病因或移植后经过的时间对结果进行分层,并未改变结果。比较三组患者血清IL-6除以谷值CsA水平的比值,组间无显著差异(t < 1.79;P > 0.09)。鉴于我们的研究结果,我们因此建议,对于先前发表的关于血清和/或尿液IL-6和/或TNF-α临床价值的报告,这些报告涉及的患者数量相对较少,并非所有患者都进行了活检,且未满足严格的临床和统计标准,应谨慎看待。