• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subtraction radiography to assess reproducibility of patient positioning in cephalometrics.

作者信息

Kantor M L, Phillips C L, Proffit W R

机构信息

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Oct;104(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81332-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81332-0
PMID:8213656
Abstract

Subtraction radiography is a way to measure differences in landmark positions between cephalometric films without using tracings that introduce another source of error. This method was used to evaluate the reproducibility of head positioning in 54 pairs of cephalometric films taken within hours of each other, before and after splint removal in orthognathic surgery patients. There were no statistically significant changes in two cranial and four maxillary landmarks; the expected changes in mandibular landmark served to validate the method. The results suggest that patient positioning is not a major contributor to the error of cephalometric methods.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subtraction radiography to assess reproducibility of patient positioning in cephalometrics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Oct;104(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81332-0.
2
A preliminary assessment of cephalometric orthodontic superimposition.头影测量正畸重叠法的初步评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2004 Apr;26(2):217-22. doi: 10.1093/ejo/26.2.217.
3
The measurement of craniocervical posture: a simple method to evaluate head position.颅颈姿势的测量:一种评估头部位置的简单方法。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Dec;73(12):1732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
4
Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.采用夹层技术评估数字化和模拟头影测量的准确性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.010.
5
A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.扫描的头颅侧位片与相应原始X光片的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Sep;130(3):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.029.
6
Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.传统与计算机辅助数字化头影测量中标志点识别的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2000 Oct;70(5):387-92. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0387:COLIIT>2.0.CO;2.
7
Head positioning error in cephalometric radiography--an implant study.
Angle Orthod. 1987 Jan;57(1):77-88. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1987)057<0077:HPEICR>2.0.CO;2.
8
Application of a video image subtraction system to measure and control head position in cephalometry.视频图像减法系统在头影测量中测量和控制头部位置的应用。
Br J Orthod. 1988 May;15(2):79-86. doi: 10.1179/bjo.15.2.79.
9
Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.通过头影测量区域叠加与传统测量评估II类错颌治疗
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Nov;128(5):607-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.036.
10
The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.在传统头影测量与数字化头影测量中,标志点识别差异对头影测量结果的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):155-61. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0155:TEODIL>2.0.CO;2.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.头影测量标志点识别的精度:锥形束计算机断层扫描与传统头影测量影像对比
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):312.e1-10; discussion 312-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.018.