Easterbrook P J, Chmiel J S, Hoover D R, Saah A J, Kaslow R A, Kingsley L A, Detels R
Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Sep 15;138(6):415-29. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116874.
To determine whether the excess prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in US black and Hispanic homosexual men relative to white men can be explained by differences in sociodemographic factors, history of sexually transmitted diseases, or sexual and drug-use behaviors, the authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline HIV-1 seroprevalence and HIV-1 risk factors among 4,475 non-Hispanic white, 234 Hispanic white, and 194 black homosexual men from four centers in the United States (Baltimore/Washington, DC, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and Los Angeles). HIV-1 seroprevalence was significantly higher in Hispanic men (50%; odds ratio (OR) = 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.39) and black men (47%; OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.21-2.16) compared with white men (35%). Both Hispanic and black men more frequently reported a history of sexually transmitted diseases. Overall, Hispanics had the highest risk profile and blacks the lowest risk profile with respect to certain high-risk sexual behaviors (e.g., receptive anal intercourse and use of anonymous sexual partners) and recreational drug use. After multivariate adjustment, black race remained a significant independent risk factor for HIV-1 seropositivity (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.13-2.26), but Hispanic ethnicity was no longer statistically significant (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.69). Most of the excess HIV-1 prevalent infection among Hispanics was explained by their predominant recruitment from Los Angeles--the study center with the highest HIV-1 seroprevalence--and their greater prevalence of a history of sexually transmitted diseases and certain high-risk sexual practices. By contrast, adjustment for these same risk behaviors failed to explain the observed black-white differences in HIV-1 seroprevalence, and further studies are needed to elucidate the reasons for these unexplained racial differences. HIV-1 educational programs for homosexual men should take into account the behavioral differences that exist between white and minority racial/ethnic groups.
为了确定美国黑人与西班牙裔同性恋男性相较于白人男性中人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)感染的过高流行率是否可以用社会人口学因素、性传播疾病史或性及药物使用行为的差异来解释,作者对来自美国四个中心(巴尔的摩/华盛顿特区、匹兹堡、芝加哥和洛杉矶)的4475名非西班牙裔白人、234名西班牙裔白人和194名黑人同性恋男性的HIV-1血清流行率基线及HIV-1风险因素进行了横断面分析。西班牙裔男性(50%;优势比(OR)=1.83,95%置信区间(CI)1.41 - 2.39)和黑人男性(47%;OR = 1.62,95% CI 1.21 - 2.16)的HIV-1血清流行率显著高于白人男性(35%)。西班牙裔和黑人男性更频繁地报告有性传播疾病史。总体而言,就某些高风险性行为(如接受肛交和使用匿名性伴侣)及娱乐性药物使用而言,西班牙裔的风险状况最高,黑人的风险状况最低。经过多变量调整后,黑人种族仍是HIV-1血清阳性的显著独立风险因素(OR = 1.60,95% CI 1.13 - 2.26),但西班牙裔种族不再具有统计学意义(OR = 1.17,95% CI 0.82 - 1.69)。西班牙裔中大部分额外的HIV-1流行感染可归因于他们主要来自洛杉矶——HIV-1血清流行率最高的研究中心——以及他们有更高的性传播疾病史流行率和某些高风险性行为发生率。相比之下,对这些相同风险行为进行调整未能解释观察到的黑人和白人之间HIV-1血清流行率的差异,需要进一步研究以阐明这些无法解释的种族差异的原因。针对同性恋男性的HIV-1教育项目应考虑白人与少数种族/族裔群体之间存在的行为差异。