三种便携式吸引装置的评估

Evaluation of three portable suction devices.

作者信息

Simon E J, Davidson J A, Boom S J

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Western Infirmary, Glasgow.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1993 Sep;48(9):807-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07598.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07598.x

PMID:8214505

Abstract

Three portable suction devices were evaluated and compared with a wall-mounted vacuum driven suction unit. The Repro-med Res-Q-Vac, the Dräger Sujector 2000 and the Laerdal suction unit were assessed by measuring the time taken to aspirate 140 ml of mock gastric contents. The respective times for each device, expressed as mean and (range) were 7.39 (4.3-10.4), 8.6 (7.8-9.4) and 11.4 (9.4-12.6) s. These compare favourable with the Ohmeda suction unit (7.27 (6.2-8.9)). Each type of device has advantages and disadvantages when factors such as size, power supply and portability are considered, and each will be the most suitable for a particular situation.

摘要

对三款便携式吸引装置进行了评估，并与一台壁挂式真空驱动吸引器进行了比较。通过测量抽吸140毫升模拟胃内容物所需的时间，对Repro-med Res-Q-Vac、德尔格Sujector 2000和Laerdal吸引装置进行了评估。每个装置的相应时间，以平均值和（范围）表示，分别为7.39（4.3 - 10.4）秒、8.6（7.8 - 9.4）秒和11.4（9.4 - 12.6）秒。与Ohmeda吸引装置（7.27（6.2 - 8.9）秒）相比，这些结果相当不错。当考虑尺寸、电源和便携性等因素时，每种类型的装置都有其优缺点，并且每种装置都将最适合特定的情况。