Suppr超能文献

四种人力便携式气道吸引器的实际评估

A practical evaluation of four human-powered portable airway aspirators.

作者信息

Arnstein F E

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1996 Jan;51(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07656.x.

Abstract

The establishment of a clear airway is a vital part of basic life support and mechanical devices are available to assist the clearance of the upper airway during resuscitation. The performances of four human-powered devices, currently available in the United Kingdom, were compared with the relevant British Standard. The ease of use of the devices by 20 experienced and 20 novice resuscitators was assessed. Three of the four devices met all British Standard criteria tested whereas the fourth failed on one test only. These devices are generally simple to use. However, two devices ('Res-Q-Vac' and 'Ambu Maxi Suction Pump') were more user friendly. The incidence of airway contamination during resuscitation and the current recommended resuscitation protocols suggest that there is a need for increased emphasis on these airway adjuncts in life-support training. Wider access to basic life support equipment inside and outside hospital premises may improve resuscitation outcome.

摘要

建立通畅气道是基本生命支持的重要组成部分,在复苏过程中可使用机械设备辅助清理上呼吸道。将英国目前可用的四种人力设备的性能与相关英国标准进行了比较。评估了20名经验丰富的复苏人员和20名新手复苏人员使用这些设备的难易程度。四种设备中的三种符合所有测试的英国标准标准,而第四种仅在一项测试中失败。这些设备通常易于使用。然而,两种设备(“Res-Q-Vac”和“Ambu Maxi Suction Pump”)更便于用户使用。复苏过程中气道污染的发生率以及当前推荐的复苏方案表明,在生命支持培训中需要更多地强调这些气道辅助设备。在医院内外更广泛地使用基本生命支持设备可能会改善复苏结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验