Kurz A, Sessler D I, Schroeder M, Kurz M
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Vienna, Austria.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Oct;77(4):721-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199310000-00011.
Reportedly, during spinal anesthesia, the shivering threshold is reduced approximately 1 degree C but the vasoconstriction threshold remains normal. Such divergence between the shivering and vasoconstriction thresholds is an unusual pattern of thermoregulatory impairment and suggests that the mechanisms of impairment during regional anesthesia may be especially complex. Accordingly, we sought to define the pattern of thermoregulatory impairment during spinal anesthesia by measuring response thresholds. Seven healthy women volunteered to participate on two study days. On one day, we evaluated thermoregulatory responses to hypothermia and hyperthermia during spinal anesthesia; on the other day, responses were evaluated without anesthesia. Upper body skin temperature was kept constant throughout the study. The volunteers were warmed via the lower body and cooled by central venous infusion of cold fluid. The core temperatures triggering a sweating rate of 40 g.m-2 x h-1, a finger flow of 0.1 mL/min, and a marked and sustained increase in oxygen consumption were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds for sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering, respectively. Spinal anesthesia significantly decreased the thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering, and the decrease in each was approximately 0.5 degree C. The range of temperatures not triggering thermoregulatory responses (those between sweating and vasoconstriction) was 0.9 +/- 0.6 degree C during spinal anesthesia. The synchronous decrease in the shivering and vasoconstriction thresholds during spinal anesthesia is consistent with thermoregulatory impairment resulting from altered afferent thermal input.
据报道,在脊髓麻醉期间,寒战阈值大约降低1摄氏度,但血管收缩阈值仍保持正常。寒战阈值和血管收缩阈值之间的这种差异是体温调节受损的一种不寻常模式,这表明区域麻醉期间的受损机制可能特别复杂。因此,我们试图通过测量反应阈值来确定脊髓麻醉期间体温调节受损的模式。七名健康女性自愿在两个研究日参与研究。一天,我们评估了脊髓麻醉期间对体温过低和过高的体温调节反应;另一天,在无麻醉的情况下评估反应。在整个研究过程中,上身皮肤温度保持恒定。志愿者通过下半身加热,并通过中心静脉输注冷液体进行冷却。引发出汗率为40 g·m-2·h-1、手指血流量为0.1 mL/min以及耗氧量显著且持续增加的核心温度分别被视为出汗、血管收缩和寒战的体温调节阈值。脊髓麻醉显著降低了血管收缩和寒战的阈值,且每一项的降低幅度约为0.5摄氏度。脊髓麻醉期间未引发体温调节反应的温度范围(即出汗和血管收缩之间的温度范围)为0.9±0.6摄氏度。脊髓麻醉期间寒战阈值和血管收缩阈值的同步降低与传入热输入改变导致的体温调节受损一致。