Corlett M P, England D W, Kidner N L, Attard A R, Fraser I A
Department of Surgery, Walsgrave Hospital, Coventry.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 Sep;75(5):330-2.
Intact surgical gloves provide an efficient barrier against the HIV and Hepatitis B viruses but glove perforations are common, particularly during mass closure of laparotomy wounds. Attempts to develop gloves immune to perforation have failed. A series of 100 consecutive laparotomy wounds were randomised to mass closure by either the 'hand in' technique currently favoured by many surgeons, or a 'no touch' technique manipulating the wound edges with instruments only. The two groups were similar with regard to grade of surgeon and assistant, proportion of routine and emergency cases, and proportion of clean or dirty cases. The wound lengths in each group were similar, and the time taken to close the abdominal wall was similar in both groups. Although a similar number of perforated gloves occurred in each group while the operative procedure was being performed ('hand in', 9 of 50 vs 'no touch', 12 of 50; P = 0.62); a significantly reduced number of glove perforations occurred in the 'no touch' group during wound closure ('hand in', 16 of 50 vs 'no touch', 3 of 50, P = 0.0017). No touch closure of the abdominal wall may provide protection to surgeons against blood-borne viruses such as HIV and hepatitis B.
完整的手术手套能有效阻隔艾滋病毒和乙肝病毒,但手套穿孔情况很常见,尤其是在大量缝合剖腹手术伤口时。研发抗穿孔手套的尝试已失败。连续100例剖腹手术伤口被随机分为两组,分别采用目前许多外科医生青睐的“手入”技术或仅用器械操作伤口边缘的“无接触”技术进行大量缝合。两组在外科医生和助手级别、常规和急诊病例比例以及清洁或污染病例比例方面相似。每组伤口长度相似,两组关闭腹壁所需时间也相似。虽然在手术过程中每组出现穿孔手套的数量相似(“手入”组50例中有9例,“无接触”组50例中有12例;P = 0.62);但在伤口缝合过程中,“无接触”组手套穿孔数量显著减少(“手入组”50例中有16例,“无接触”组50例中有3例,P = 0.0017)。腹壁的无接触缝合可能为外科医生提供针对艾滋病毒和乙肝等血源病毒的防护。