Kaiser A, Illi O E, Sailer H F, Stauffer U G
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993 Aug;3(4):236-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063551.
From 1974 to 1992 fifty-two patients with congenital or acquired skull defects were operated at the Department of Pediatric Surgery of the University Children's Hospital of Zurich. By 1988, in 26 patients conventional methods with PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) plasties or rib plasties were performed. After 1988, in 26 patients skull reconstruction was done by skull splitting, application of lyophilized bone or cartilage or a combination of both. In the latter period, stabilization and fixation was always provided by biodegradable screws and bands. The results of the different techniques were compared in a retrospective fashion. PMMA plasties provided immediately full stability and good cosmetic results. Another advantage was their availability. In one patient (= 4.8%), a wound infection required the removal of the plasty. In two other patients (9.5%), an increasing mobility of the plasty could be observed during skull growth. Rib plasties were not satisfying. Skull splitting or reconstruction with lyophilized bone or cartilage showed good results with a stable integration within 3-4 months. In one patient (4%), a superficial wound infection occurred, but it did not affect the plasty. From the present study, we conclude that skull splitting or the reconstruction of skull continuity by means of lyophilized bone or cartilage with fixation through biodegradable screws and bands are the methods of first choice in children, because they are fully integrated, avoid foreign material and might have a slightly lower risk of infection. In addition, removal of the implants may be avoided.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
1974年至1992年期间,苏黎世大学儿童医院小儿外科为52例先天性或后天性颅骨缺损患者实施了手术。到1988年,26例患者采用了聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)塑形或肋骨塑形等传统方法。1988年之后,26例患者通过颅骨劈开术、应用冻干骨或软骨或两者结合进行颅骨重建。在后一时期,稳定和固定始终采用可生物降解的螺钉和束带。对不同技术的结果进行了回顾性比较。PMMA塑形能立即提供完全的稳定性和良好的美容效果。另一个优点是其可用性。1例患者(4.8%)发生伤口感染,需要移除塑形材料。另外2例患者(9.5%)在颅骨生长过程中可观察到塑形材料的活动度增加。肋骨塑形效果不理想。颅骨劈开术或用冻干骨或软骨进行重建显示出良好的效果,在3 - 4个月内实现稳定融合。1例患者(4%)发生浅表伤口感染,但未影响塑形材料。从本研究中,我们得出结论,颅骨劈开术或通过冻干骨或软骨重建颅骨连续性并通过可生物降解的螺钉和束带进行固定是儿童的首选方法,因为它们能完全融合,避免异物,且感染风险可能略低。此外,可避免植入物的移除。(摘要截选至250词)