Suppr超能文献

When pregnant patients refuse interventions.

作者信息

Tauer C A

出版信息

AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1993;4(4):596-605.

PMID:8220374
Abstract

Good communication between clinician and pregnant patients should avert most decision-making conflicts. Pregnant women may legitimately refuse prenatal screening procedures in view of the limited follow-up options. They also may choose alternatives to most standard obstetric interventions; clinical studies raise questions about the necessity of these interventions. A well-informed woman may refuse cesarean delivery in most situations: predictions of harm are highly uncertain, and she would be asked to accept risk and harm for the sake of another. However, in exceptional situations in which harm to the fetus is nearly certain and vaginal delivery also endangers the woman, the harm-to-others principle limits autonomy, and coercion may be ethically justifiable.

摘要

相似文献

1
When pregnant patients refuse interventions.
AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs. 1993;4(4):596-605.
2
Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 1999 Mar;1(1):7-9.
9
Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Summer;38(2):436-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00502.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验