Levy H, Griego L
Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque.
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1537-40. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1537.
A prospective study was done to compare four different methods of securing oral endotracheal tubes: adhesive tape (A), Twill tape (T), Twill tape with FlexBlue bite block (TFXB), and Velcro tie with FlexBlue (VFXB), used on sequential days. Thirty-six patients were enrolled for 136 patient-days and 18 had complete 4-day cycles. The methods were evaluated twice daily by nurses, respiratory therapist, and patient, on a five-point Likert scale with regard to oral hygiene, patient comfort, nurse satisfaction, and ease of use. Tube movement relative to the incisor teeth was measured at end of shift, the use of a bite block was noted, and near extubations were documented. Analysis of variance and Student's t test with Bonferroni correction were performed. Adhesive tape had 33 patient-days, 0.4 +/- 0.7 cm movement, 3.4 +/- 0.9 oral hygiene, 4.0 +/- 0.8 comfort, 4.2 +/- 0.6 nurse satisfaction, and 4.2 +/- 0.7 ease of use. Twill tape had 34 patient-days, 0.7 +/- 1.1 cm movement, 3.0 +/- 0.7 oral hygiene, 3.1 +/- 0.9 comfort, 2.8 +/- 1.0 nurse satisfaction, and 3.3 +/- 1.1 ease of use. Twill tape with FlexBlue bite block had 35 patient-days, 1.3 +/- 2.0 cm movement, 2.5 +/- 1.2 oral hygiene, 1.9 +/- 1.1 comfort, 1.9 +/- 1.0 nurse satisfaction, and 2.1 +/- 1.1 ease of use. Velcro tie with FlexBlue had 34 patient-days, 0.8 +/- 1.0 cm movement, 1.9 +/- 1.2 oral hygiene, 1.5 +/- 1.4 comfort, 1.6 +/- 1.0 nurse satisfaction, and 1.8 +/- 1.1 ease of use. Statistical analysis showed no difference between the groups for tube movement. Method A was statistically superior to VFXB and TFXB on all other parameters, and T on all except oral hygiene. Twill tape was superior to VFXB on all, and TFXB on patient comfort, nurse satisfaction, and ease of use. There was no significant difference between TFXB and VFXB on any measured parameter. Adhesive tape and T required an oral airway on only 14 days compared with 69 days of FlexBlue use. Extubation on 2 and near extubation occurred on 18 occasions with FlexBlue use and only once with T and accounted for most decisions to change securing method. We cannot recommend the use of the FlexBlue system for securing oral endotracheal tubes.
开展了一项前瞻性研究,以比较四种不同的口腔气管插管固定方法:胶布(A)、斜纹布带(T)、带FlexBlue咬口器的斜纹布带(TFXB)和带FlexBlue的尼龙搭扣带(VFXB),这些方法在连续几天内依次使用。36名患者参与研究,共136个患者日,其中18名患者完成了4天的周期。护士、呼吸治疗师和患者每天对这些方法进行两次评估,采用五点李克特量表,评估内容包括口腔卫生、患者舒适度、护士满意度和易用性。在每班结束时测量气管导管相对于切牙的移动情况,记录咬口器的使用情况,并记录接近拔管的情况。进行方差分析和经Bonferroni校正的学生t检验。胶布组有33个患者日,移动距离为0.4±0.7厘米,口腔卫生评分为3.4±0.9,舒适度评分为4.0±0.8,护士满意度评分为4.2±0.6,易用性评分为4.2±0.7。斜纹布带组有34个患者日,移动距离为0.7±1.1厘米,口腔卫生评分为3.0±0.7,舒适度评分为3.1±0.9,护士满意度评分为2.8±1.0,易用性评分为3.3±1.1。带FlexBlue咬口器的斜纹布带组有35个患者日,移动距离为1.3±2.0厘米,口腔卫生评分为2.5±1.2,舒适度评分为1.9±1.1,护士满意度评分为1.9±1.0,易用性评分为2.1±1.1。带FlexBlue的尼龙搭扣带组有34个患者日,移动距离为0.8±1.0厘米,口腔卫生评分为1.9±1.2,舒适度评分为1.5±1.4,护士满意度评分为1.6±1.0,易用性评分为1.8±1.1。统计分析表明,各组之间在气管导管移动方面无差异。方法A在所有其他参数上在统计学上优于VFXB和TFXB,在除口腔卫生外的所有参数上优于T。斜纹布带在所有方面均优于VFXB,在患者舒适度、护士满意度和易用性方面优于TFXB。TFXB和VFXB在任何测量参数上均无显著差异。胶布和T仅在14天需要使用口咽气道,而FlexBlue使用了69天。使用FlexBlue时,有2次拔管和18次接近拔管情况,而使用T时仅出现1次,这也是改变固定方法的主要决定因素。我们不建议使用FlexBlue系统来固定口腔气管插管。