Schnaiderman D, Lahat E, Sheefer T, Aladjem M
Paediatric Division, Assaf Harofeh Medical Centre, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel.
Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Sep;152(9):747-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01953992.
A controlled clinical study compared the antipyretic effectiveness of acetaminophen administered at regular 4h intervals (group 1, n = 53) versus sporadic usage contingent upon a body temperature above 37.9 degrees C (group 2, n = 51) in 104 children presenting with simple febrile convulsions. The incidence of febrile episodes or temperature values were similar in spite of significantly larger amounts of acetaminophen administered to patients in group 1. Four and 4 children in groups 1 and 2, respectively, had a second episode of febrile seizures, in all of them within the first 24h of admission. We conclude that the prophylactic administration of acetaminophen in children with febrile seizures is not effective in the prevention of fever, the reduction of its degree, or in preventing the early recurrence of febrile seizures.
一项对照临床研究比较了104例单纯性热性惊厥儿童中,每4小时定期服用对乙酰氨基酚的退热效果(第1组,n = 53)与体温高于37.9摄氏度时偶尔使用对乙酰氨基酚的效果(第2组,n = 51)。尽管第1组患者服用的对乙酰氨基酚量明显更多,但发热发作的发生率或体温值相似。第1组和第2组分别有4名和4名儿童再次出现热性惊厥发作,均在入院后的头24小时内。我们得出结论,对热性惊厥儿童预防性服用对乙酰氨基酚在预防发热、降低发热程度或预防热性惊厥早期复发方面均无效。