Grunder U, Hürzeler M B, Schüpbach P, Strub J R
Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Dental Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(3):282-93.
This study evaluated the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis using guided tissue regeneration (GTR) around submerged and nonsubmerged implants in beagle dogs. Two titanium implants were placed bilaterally in the premolar regions of the mandible in each of 10 beagle dogs. Cotton floss ligatures were placed around the implant necks and no oral hygiene procedures were performed for 5 months. Periodontal surgery was performed, and in five dogs (submerged group) the abutments were removed and an e-PTFE barrier was placed to cover the test implants and their adjacent osseous defects, while the control implants received no barriers. In the other five dogs (nonsubmerged group), flap surgery was performed without removing the abutments. In the test sites, an e-PTFE barrier was placed around the abutment and adjacent defects, while on the control sites no barrier was placed. Nondecalcified specimens were prepared using standard histologic methods and analyzed. No differences were found between any of the clinical parameters in both the control and experimental sites from the submerged and nonsubmerged groups. Histologic and histomorphometric analyses also revealed no significant differences between groups with regard to new bone formation. In the experimental (GTR) groups, however, the amount of regenerated connective tissue was significantly greater than on the control groups. Under the conditions of this study, the treatment of peri-implantitis using GTR did not enhance clinical parameters or bone formation around "diseased" implants.
本研究评估了在比格犬中,使用引导组织再生(GTR)对潜入式和非潜入式种植体周围结扎诱导的种植体周围炎进行治疗的效果。在10只比格犬的每只犬的下颌前磨牙区域双侧植入两颗钛种植体。在种植体颈部放置棉线结扎,5个月内不进行口腔卫生护理。进行牙周手术,在5只犬(潜入组)中,去除基台并放置e-PTFE屏障以覆盖试验种植体及其相邻的骨缺损,而对照种植体不放置屏障。在另外5只犬(非潜入组)中,进行翻瓣手术但不去除基台。在试验部位,在基台和相邻缺损周围放置e-PTFE屏障,而在对照部位不放置屏障。使用标准组织学方法制备未脱钙标本并进行分析。潜入组和非潜入组的对照和试验部位的任何临床参数之间均未发现差异。组织学和组织形态计量学分析也显示,各组之间在新骨形成方面无显著差异。然而,在试验(GTR)组中,再生结缔组织的量明显大于对照组。在本研究条件下,使用GTR治疗种植体周围炎并未改善“患病”种植体周围的临床参数或骨形成。