• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2.0毫米自攻螺钉的单轴拔出试验与扭矩测量的比较。

Comparison between uniaxial pull-out tests and torque measurement of 2.0-mm self-tapping screws.

作者信息

Boyle J M, Frost D E, Foley W L, Grady J J

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina.

出版信息

Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(2):129-33.

PMID:8228429
Abstract

This study investigates the retentive capacity of 2.0-mm self-tapping screws in porcine rib utilizing axial pull-out tests as well as torque measurements of insertion and stripping. These techniques have been performed independently; this analysis assesses the association between pull-out and torque values. The Goodman-Kruskel correlation coefficient between pull-out and insertional torque is 0.13, while the correlation between pull-out and stripping torque is 0.21. Partial correlation indexes control the thickness of bone, a confounding factor. Nonparametric analysis of covariance showed no significant difference between insertion of screws and pull-out of the screws, but stripping versus pull-out test was significant. Given these findings, it appears that insertional torque may be used as an alternative technique for screw retention analysis. Because insertional torque tests can be conducted in the operating room, results of clinical studies can be compared to laboratory analyses.

摘要

本研究利用轴向拔出试验以及插入和拧出扭矩测量,调查了2.0毫米自攻螺钉在猪肋骨中的固位能力。这些技术是独立进行的;本分析评估了拔出力与扭矩值之间的关联。拔出力与插入扭矩之间的古德曼-克鲁斯卡尔相关系数为0.13,而拔出力与拧出扭矩之间的相关系数为0.21。偏相关指数控制了骨厚度这一混杂因素。非参数协方差分析表明,螺钉的插入与拔出之间无显著差异,但拧出与拔出试验有显著差异。基于这些发现,插入扭矩似乎可作为螺钉固位分析的替代技术。由于插入扭矩测试可在手术室进行,因此临床研究结果可与实验室分析结果进行比较。

相似文献

1
Comparison between uniaxial pull-out tests and torque measurement of 2.0-mm self-tapping screws.2.0毫米自攻螺钉的单轴拔出试验与扭矩测量的比较。
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(2):129-33.
2
Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.小型种植体在下颌犬骨中的植入扭矩和轴向拔出强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):790.e15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.020.
3
Substitutes for human cadaveric bone in maxillofacial rigid fixation research.颌面坚固内固定研究中人体尸体骨的替代物
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Nov;90(5):574-80. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.111025.
4
Evaluation of emergency screws in nonstripped pilot holes in bone.
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(3):211-5.
5
Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area.下颌-上颌区域四种不同微型螺钉用于骨锚固的生物力学比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;37(10):948-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
6
Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.解剖轨迹椎弓根螺钉与可注射硫酸钙植骨增强椎弓根螺钉在尸体胸椎骨挽救中的生物力学比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jun;19(4):286-91. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211203.31244.a0.
7
Torque and pullout analysis of six currently available self-tapping and "emergency" screws.六种市售自攻和“应急”螺钉的扭矩及拔出力分析
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993 Jan;51(1):45-50. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80389-1.
8
Pull-out strength of monocortical screws placed in the maxillae and mandibles of dogs.置于犬上颌骨和下颌骨的单皮质螺钉的拔出强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Mar;127(3):307-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.023.
9
Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.椎弓根螺钉固定强度:拔出力与插入扭矩
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.02.006.
10
The effect of pilot hole size on the insertion torque and pullout strength of self-tapping cortical bone screws in osteoporotic bone.导向孔尺寸对骨质疏松性骨中自攻皮质骨螺钉插入扭矩和拔出强度的影响。
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):990-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802bf051.