Vineis P, Soskolne C L
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Main Hospital, Torino, Italy.
J Occup Med. 1993 Sep;35(9):902-8. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199309000-00013.
We explored ethical issues in cancer risk assessment and management. Although literature about risk assessment and management is increasing, few attempts have been made to address directly either their ethical aspects or implications. We have compared ethical considerations raised at the community level with those classically considered in the physician-patient setting. Established principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice are shown not to be easily applicable at the societal level. Available information about the safety of exposures often is too scanty to allow decisional autonomy; beneficence is considered from the societal viewpoint rather than from that of the individual; and equity is frequently violated. Ethics require careful consideration when defining what is acceptable to society; the simple mathematical formulations used for risk-benefit evaluations cannot be applied directly to individuals. Further development and integration of these ideas are necessary.
我们探讨了癌症风险评估与管理中的伦理问题。尽管关于风险评估与管理的文献日益增多,但很少有人直接探讨其伦理层面或影响。我们将社区层面提出的伦理考量与医患环境中传统考虑的因素进行了比较。结果表明,既定的自主、行善、不伤害和分配正义原则在社会层面并不容易适用。关于暴露安全性的现有信息往往过于稀少,无法实现决策自主;行善是从社会角度而非个人角度来考虑的;公平也经常受到侵犯。在界定社会可接受的事物时,伦理需要仔细考量;用于风险效益评估的简单数学公式不能直接应用于个体。有必要进一步发展和整合这些理念。