Suppr超能文献

伦理学、科学有效性与流行病学研究设计

Ethics, scientific validity, and the design of epidemiologic studies.

作者信息

Coughlin S S, Beauchamp T L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20007.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1992 Jul;3(4):343-7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199207000-00009.

Abstract

Ethical conflicts between moral principles and methodologic standards sometimes occur in epidemiologic research. When dilemmas are discerned, they may be analyzed using the ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice, and respect for the autonomy of persons. We argue that, in addition to scientific validity, the welfare and rights of research subjects should be taken into account in making decisions regarding all aspects of the design and conduct of epidemiologic studies, and that the commitment of epidemiologists to the advancement of scientific knowledge should not outweigh or override all other considerations.

摘要

在流行病学研究中,道德原则与方法学标准之间有时会出现伦理冲突。当识别出困境时,可以运用有益、无害、公正以及尊重个人自主性等伦理原则进行分析。我们认为,除了科学有效性之外,在做出关于流行病学研究设计和实施的各个方面的决策时,还应考虑研究对象的福利和权利,并且流行病学家对科学知识进步的承诺不应超过或凌驾于所有其他考虑因素之上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验