Horbar J D, Wright L L, Soll R F, Wright E C, Fanaroff A A, Korones S B, Shankaran S, Oh W, Fletcher B D, Bauer C R
University of Vermont, Burlington.
J Pediatr. 1993 Nov;123(5):757-66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80856-x.
To compare the efficacy of two surfactants, Exosurf Neonatal (Burroughs Wellcome Co.) and Survanta (Ross Laboratories), for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
Multicenter randomized trial.
Eleven tertiary care university neonatal intensive care units participating in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.
Newborn infants (n = 617) weighing 501 to 1500 gm with respiratory distress syndrome who were receiving assisted ventilation with 30% oxygen or more within 6 hours of birth were enrolled between January 1991 and January 1992.
Infants were randomly assigned to receive up to four intratracheal doses of either Exosurf Neonatal (n = 309) or Survanta (n = 308).
The occurrence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia 28 days after birth and the average fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) and mean airway pressure (MAP) during the first 72 hours after treatment.
Death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia occurred in 67% of the infants in the Exosurf group and 62% of those in the Survanta group (adjusted relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.20). During the 72 hours after the first surfactant dose, the average FIO2 (+/- SEM) was 0.50 +/- 0.01 for Exosurf and 0.42 +/- 0.01 for Survanta (difference, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.11); the average MAP (+/- SEM) was 7.64 +/- 0.21 cm H2O for Exosurf and 6.93 +/- 0.21 cm H2O for Survanta (difference, 0.71 cm H2O; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 1.29 cm H2O). There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of other neonatal morbidities or in the duration of hospitalization, assisted ventilation, or supplemental oxygen administration.
We found no difference between treatment groups in the incidence of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia, although we did observe a difference in the initial response to treatment as measured by FIO2 and MAP.
比较两种表面活性剂Exosurf Neonatal(百时美施贵宝公司)和Survanta(罗斯实验室)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效。
多中心随机试验。
11家参与国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所新生儿研究网络的三级护理大学新生儿重症监护病房。
1991年1月至1992年1月期间,纳入体重501至1500克、患有呼吸窘迫综合征且在出生后6小时内接受30%或更高浓度氧气辅助通气的新生儿(n = 617)。
婴儿被随机分配接受最多四次气管内剂量的Exosurf Neonatal(n = 309)或Survanta(n = 308)。
出生后28天死亡或支气管肺发育不良的发生率,以及治疗后前72小时内吸入氧分数(FIO2)平均值和平均气道压(MAP)。
Exosurf组67%的婴儿和Survanta组62%的婴儿发生死亡或支气管肺发育不良(校正相对风险,1.07;95%置信区间,0.96至1.20)。在首次给予表面活性剂后的72小时内,Exosurf组的平均FIO2(±标准误)为0.50±0.01,Survanta组为0.42±0.01(差异为0.08;95%置信区间,0.05至0.11);Exosurf组的平均MAP(±标准误)为7.64±0.21厘米水柱,Survanta组为6.93±0.21厘米水柱(差异为0.71厘米水柱;95%置信区间,0.13至1.29厘米水柱)。两组在其他新生儿疾病发生率以及住院时间、辅助通气时间或补充氧气使用时间方面无差异。
我们发现治疗组在死亡或支气管肺发育不良发生率上无差异,尽管我们确实观察到以FIO2和MAP衡量的初始治疗反应存在差异。