Suppr超能文献

两种用于输尿管结石碎石术的脉冲激光的比较:154例患者的报告

Comparison of 2 pulsed lasers for lithotripsy of ureteral calculi: report on 154 patients.

作者信息

Benizri E, Wodey J, Amiel J, Toubol J

机构信息

Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France.

出版信息

J Urol. 1993 Dec;150(6):1803-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35900-1.

Abstract

Extracorporeal lithotripsy does not always provide satisfactory results for the treatment of ureteral stones. Such cases appear to be excellent indications for endocorporeal lithotripsy based on an association of ureteroscopy and laser. To compare the performances of 2 pulsed lasers, the pulsed dye laser (Candela) and solid Q switched laser (HMT), for the treatment of these calculi 161 ureteral stones were treated successively from November 1990 to March 1992 by a combination of ureteroscopy and laser. Endocorporeal lithotripsy was performed in 102 cases with the Candela laser, in 47 with the HMT laser and in 7 with both lasers. With a stable success rate greater than 90%, both lasers demonstrated equivalent performances regardless of the location of the stone along the ureter. However, while stone fragmentation was more rapid with the Candela laser, the HMT laser appeared to be more effective for dark stones (monohydrate calcium oxidate).

摘要

体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石并非总能取得令人满意的效果。基于输尿管镜检查与激光联合使用的体内碎石术似乎是治疗此类病例的理想方法。为比较两种脉冲激光,即脉冲染料激光(坎德拉公司生产)和固体调Q激光(HMT)治疗这些结石的效果,1990年11月至1992年3月期间,对161例输尿管结石患者先后采用输尿管镜检查与激光联合治疗。其中102例使用坎德拉激光进行体内碎石术,47例使用HMT激光,7例两种激光都使用。两种激光的成功率均稳定高于90%,无论结石在输尿管中的位置如何,它们都表现出相当的效果。然而,虽然使用坎德拉激光时结石破碎更快,但HMT激光似乎对深色结石(一水合草酸钙)更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验