Benizri E, Wodey J, Amiel J, Toubol J
Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France.
J Urol. 1993 Dec;150(6):1803-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35900-1.
Extracorporeal lithotripsy does not always provide satisfactory results for the treatment of ureteral stones. Such cases appear to be excellent indications for endocorporeal lithotripsy based on an association of ureteroscopy and laser. To compare the performances of 2 pulsed lasers, the pulsed dye laser (Candela) and solid Q switched laser (HMT), for the treatment of these calculi 161 ureteral stones were treated successively from November 1990 to March 1992 by a combination of ureteroscopy and laser. Endocorporeal lithotripsy was performed in 102 cases with the Candela laser, in 47 with the HMT laser and in 7 with both lasers. With a stable success rate greater than 90%, both lasers demonstrated equivalent performances regardless of the location of the stone along the ureter. However, while stone fragmentation was more rapid with the Candela laser, the HMT laser appeared to be more effective for dark stones (monohydrate calcium oxidate).
体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石并非总能取得令人满意的效果。基于输尿管镜检查与激光联合使用的体内碎石术似乎是治疗此类病例的理想方法。为比较两种脉冲激光,即脉冲染料激光(坎德拉公司生产)和固体调Q激光(HMT)治疗这些结石的效果,1990年11月至1992年3月期间,对161例输尿管结石患者先后采用输尿管镜检查与激光联合治疗。其中102例使用坎德拉激光进行体内碎石术,47例使用HMT激光,7例两种激光都使用。两种激光的成功率均稳定高于90%,无论结石在输尿管中的位置如何,它们都表现出相当的效果。然而,虽然使用坎德拉激光时结石破碎更快,但HMT激光似乎对深色结石(一水合草酸钙)更有效。