Brix G, Heiland S, Bellemann M E, Koch T, Lorenz W J
Research Program Radiological Diagnostics and Therapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(7):977-91. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(93)90217-2.
Since lipid protons, consisting mainly of triacylglycerols (TAG), are rather mobile, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is ideally suited for the examination of fat-containing tissues such as bone marrow. In contrast to water protons, however, lipid protons are chemically distinct and give rise to at least eight resonance peaks with different T1 and T2 relaxation times in the 1H spectrum. This is why the characterization of fat-containing tissues by quantitative MRI is much more difficult than that of most other tissues. In our study we wanted to examine the accuracy and the potential of a 1H chemical shift imaging (CSI) technique and a multiple spin-echo imaging (MSEI) technique. A stimulated-echo (STEAM) sequence for spatially localized proton spectroscopy was used as the reference method. In the first part of this paper, we describe quantitative imaging experiments which were performed to assess the accuracy of the fat-water separation according to the Dixon method and the bi-exponential decomposition of the MSEI data. For that purpose, we used a two-compartment phantom filled with either an aqueous Gd-DTPA solution and vegetable oil or with two different aqueous Gd-DTPA solutions, respectively. The analysis of the 1H CSI data revealed that the presence of non-methylen protons in neutral fats leads to a slight under-estimation (of about 15%) of the relative fat fraction. The error is described theoretically and verified quantitatively by STEAM measurements. The bi-exponential analysis of the transverse relaxation data, on the other hand, yields reliable T2 values if the relative proton density of both components is higher than 15%. IN the second part of our investigation, the same techniques were applied to acquire data from the subcutaneous fatty tissue, the femoral head, and the lumbar vertebrae of three healthy volunteers. In the bone marrow spectra, only two broad resonances could be resolved; they were superpositions of diverse molecular groups with different T1 and T2 relaxation times. In these cases, localized proton spectroscopy does not provide additional information with respect to 1H CSI. The MSEI data of the three examined fat containing tissue regions were adequately fitted by a bi-exponential function despite the fact that there were much more chemically distinct protons present in fatty tissues.
由于主要由三酰甘油(TAG)组成的脂质质子具有较高的流动性,磁共振成像(MRI)非常适合用于检查含脂肪组织,如骨髓。然而,与水质子不同,脂质质子在化学性质上有所不同,并且在1H谱中会产生至少八个具有不同T1和T2弛豫时间的共振峰。这就是为什么通过定量MRI对含脂肪组织进行表征比大多数其他组织要困难得多的原因。在我们的研究中,我们想要研究1H化学位移成像(CSI)技术和多重自旋回波成像(MSEI)技术的准确性和潜力。使用用于空间定位质子光谱的受激回波(STEAM)序列作为参考方法。在本文的第一部分,我们描述了定量成像实验,这些实验旨在根据狄克逊方法评估脂肪-水分离的准确性以及MSEI数据的双指数分解。为此,我们使用了一个两室模型,分别填充有含水钆-二乙三胺五乙酸(Gd-DTPA)溶液和植物油,或者两种不同的含水钆-二乙三胺五乙酸溶液。对1H CSI数据的分析表明,中性脂肪中非亚甲基质子的存在会导致相对脂肪分数略有低估(约15%)。该误差在理论上进行了描述,并通过STEAM测量进行了定量验证。另一方面,如果两种成分的相对质子密度高于15%,对横向弛豫数据的双指数分析会得出可靠的T2值。在我们研究的第二部分,应用相同的技术从三名健康志愿者的皮下脂肪组织、股骨头和腰椎获取数据。在骨髓光谱中,只能分辨出两个宽共振峰;它们是具有不同T1和T2弛豫时间的不同分子基团的叠加。在这些情况下,局部质子光谱相对于1H CSI并没有提供额外的信息。尽管脂肪组织中存在更多化学性质不同的质子,但对三个检查的含脂肪组织区域的MSEI数据仍能通过双指数函数进行充分拟合。