Suppr超能文献

使用两种往复式步态矫形器对截瘫步态表现的比较。

A comparison of paraplegic gait performance using two types of reciprocating gait orthoses.

作者信息

Winchester P K, Carollo J J, Parekh R N, Lutz L M, Aston J W

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993 Aug;17(2):101-6. doi: 10.3109/03093649309164364.

Abstract

This study examined the energy cost of ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) and the modified Isocentric RGO in paraplegic spinal cord injured subjects. In 4 subjects, the rates of O2 consumption per minute, O2 cost per metre, heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio, velocity, and physiologic cost index (PCI) were measured during ambulation with the two orthotic devices. PCI was calculated by dividing the difference between walking and resting HR by velocity. PCI was significantly lower during ambulation trials with the Isocentric RGO compared to the RGO, but was the only measurement that detected a significant difference between the two orthotic devices. These results indicate that energy costs of ambulation at self-selected speeds were lower with the Isocentric RGO compared to the standard RGO. Furthermore, PCI could be used as a sensitive indicator of gait efficiency in spinal cord injury subjects.

摘要

本研究调查了截瘫脊髓损伤患者使用往复式步态矫形器(RGO)和改良同心RGO行走时的能量消耗情况。在4名受试者中,使用这两种矫形器行走时,测量了每分钟耗氧量、每米氧气消耗、心率(HR)、呼吸交换率、速度和生理成本指数(PCI)。PCI通过行走心率与静息心率之差除以速度来计算。与RGO相比,使用同心RGO行走试验期间的PCI显著更低,但它是唯一能检测到两种矫形器之间存在显著差异的测量指标。这些结果表明,与标准RGO相比,使用同心RGO以自选速度行走时的能量消耗更低。此外,PCI可作为脊髓损伤患者步态效率的敏感指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验