Morimoto I
Department of Anatomy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1993 Aug;68(4):381-98.
The mummy of priest Kochi (preserved at Saishoji Temple, Teradomari, Niigata Pref.) has become famous, since it appeared in the book "Snow Country Tales" written by Bokushi Suzuki in 1841 (Fig. 1). In a country of high humidity, such as Japan, the belief that mummification could not, and did not, exist would not be altogether unfounded, but rather more a matter of common sense. There are two dozen Buddhist mummies in this country. It was not known until 1961 that a reliable source of artificial mummification has existed in Japan. The Japanese Buddhist mummies, apart from those of the Fujiwara family, a powerful clan of northeast Japan in the 12th century, dated mostly from the 17th to the 19th century as given in Table 1. Three principal types of mummification described by Vreeland, Jr. and Cockburn (1980) could be identified in the Japanese Buddhist mummies: type I, natural mummification; type II, intentional natural; and type III, artificial. Matsumoto (1990) classified the mummies into four groups, based on their ideological backgrounds: group A, mummies of the priests having faith in the Amitabha (the Supreme Buddha presiding over the Pure Land in the West); group B, sokushin-butsu mummies of the priests belonging to the Shingon sect of Japanese Buddhism founded by Kukai (Kobo-daishi); group C, nyujo mummies of the priests having faith in the Maitreya (the Buddha presiding over the Pure Land in the North, or the Buddha of the future); and group D, other mummies. These mummies of groups A, B, C and D are respectively listed in Table 2. Previous papers have shown that the mummies of the groups A, C and D belonged to the mummification of type I (natural mummification) or type II (intentional natural), whereas those of only the group B were of type III (artificial). The mummies of groups A to D were given as follows. a) Mummies of group A. The four mummies of the Fujiwara family in the Amitabha faith (preserved at Chusonji Temple, Hiraizumi, Iwate Pref.), which were laid in daisies for Buddhist images at golden Konjikido, a model of the Western Pure Land of Amitabha, did not bear any evidence of Ainu character in their physical traits. Of these, the mummy of Yasuhira Fujiwara, of which the head and neck were severely injured by swords, showed that it had been decapitated. This decapitated head had suffered mutilations: i.e. a long iron nail had been driven into the forehead, and the both auricles and the nose had been cut off.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
高知和尚的木乃伊(保存在新潟县寺泊的西正寺)自1841年铃木牧之写的《雪国故事》一书中出现后便声名远扬(图1)。在日本这样湿度较高的国家,认为木乃伊不可能也不存在的观念并非毫无根据,而更像是一种常识。这个国家有二十多具佛教木乃伊。直到1961年才知道日本存在可靠的人工木乃伊制作方法。除了12世纪日本东北部的强大氏族藤原家族的木乃伊外,日本佛教木乃伊大多可追溯到17至19世纪,如表1所示。小弗里兰和科伯恩(1980年)描述的三种主要木乃伊制作类型在日本佛教木乃伊中都能找到:I型,自然木乃伊化;II型,有意自然木乃伊化;III型,人工木乃伊化。松本(1990年)根据其思想背景将木乃伊分为四类:A组,信仰阿弥陀佛(西方净土的最高佛陀)的僧侣木乃伊;B组,属于空海(弘法大师)创立的日本佛教真言宗的即身佛木乃伊;C组,信仰弥勒佛(北方净土的佛陀或未来佛)的僧侣入寂木乃伊;D组,其他木乃伊。A、B、C、D组的这些木乃伊分别列在表2中。以前的论文表明,A、C和D组的木乃伊属于I型(自然木乃伊化)或II型(有意自然木乃伊化),而只有B组的木乃伊属于III型(人工木乃伊化)。A至D组的木乃伊情况如下。a)A组木乃伊。藤原家族信仰阿弥陀佛的四具木乃伊(保存在岩手县平泉的中尊寺),安放在金色的金光明殿(西方阿弥陀佛净土的模型)的佛像雏菊台上,其身体特征没有任何阿伊努人的特征。其中,藤原保平的木乃伊头部和颈部被剑严重砍伤,显示出被斩首的迹象。这个被斩首的头颅遭受了 mutilations:即一根长铁钉被钉入前额,双耳和鼻子都被割掉了。(摘要截选至400字)