Suppr超能文献

统计学意义与临床意义之争

The statistical versus clinical significance debate.

作者信息

LeFort S M

机构信息

School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Image J Nurs Sch. 1993 Spring;25(1):57-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00754.x.

Abstract

There is general agreement that tests of statistical significance do not provide information about the clinical significance or practical importance of research results. Yet the concept of clinical significance has received little discussion or debate in the nursing literature. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast statistical and clinical significance, to provide an overview of the issues surrounding their uses as described in the methodological literature from a variety of disciplines, and to discuss some implications of these concepts for nursing research.

摘要

人们普遍认为,统计学显著性检验并不能提供有关研究结果的临床意义或实际重要性的信息。然而,临床意义的概念在护理文献中很少受到讨论或辩论。本文的目的是比较和对比统计学显著性和临床意义,概述来自不同学科的方法论文献中所描述的围绕它们使用的问题,并讨论这些概念对护理研究的一些影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验