Bohdiewicz P J
Department of Nuclear Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073.
Clin Nucl Med. 1993 Oct;18(10):867-71. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199310000-00009.
Biliary scans of 84 hospitalized patients believed to likely have acute cholecystitis, including 55 scans that had a radionuclide angiography phase, were retrospectively evaluated to determine the frequency of the rim sign and hyperperfusion, and to test the hypothesis that more intense hyperperfusion or rim sign is associated with a greater severity of gallbladder pathology ("complicated" acute cholecystitis). In 65 of the 84 cases there was surgical intervention (including 43 from the 55 cases whose scans had a radionuclide angiography phase). "Complicated" acute cholecystitis was considered present if there was gangrene, perforation, empyema, necrosis, ulceration, or fibrous exudation. Each scan was evaluated for the presence of a rim sign and arterial hyperperfusion to the region of the gallbladder fossa. The intensities of these secondary signs of acute cholecystitis were then graded as "mild" or "marked." Subdividing the rim sign and hyperperfusion into a "marked" category considerably improved the specificity, positive predictive value, and likelihood ratio (positive) for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, but even more so for the complicated subgroup when marked hyperperfusion or marked rim sign were the criteria used for a positive study. Approximately 50% of the patients with acute cholecystitis had hyperperfusion and a rim sign, and approximately 15% had marked hyperperfusion and a marked rim sign. Of the patients with acute cholecystitis, the only ones with marked hyperperfusion or a marked rim sign were those who had complicated acute cholecystitis. The data demonstrate an association between greater intensity of the rim sign or hyperperfusion and greater severity of gallbladder pathology in patients with acute cholecystitis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对84例疑似患有急性胆囊炎的住院患者进行了胆道扫描,其中55例扫描有放射性核素血管造影期,对这些扫描进行回顾性评估,以确定边缘征和血流灌注增加的发生率,并检验以下假设:更强的血流灌注增加或边缘征与胆囊病变的更严重程度(“复杂性”急性胆囊炎)相关。84例患者中有65例接受了手术干预(包括55例扫描有放射性核素血管造影期患者中的43例)。如果存在坏疽、穿孔、积脓、坏死、溃疡或纤维渗出,则认为存在“复杂性”急性胆囊炎。对每次扫描评估胆囊窝区域是否存在边缘征和动脉血流灌注增加。然后将这些急性胆囊炎的次要征象强度分为“轻度”或“显著”。将边缘征和血流灌注增加细分为“显著”类别,可显著提高急性胆囊炎诊断的特异性、阳性预测值和阳性似然比,对于复杂性亚组而言,当以显著血流灌注增加或显著边缘征作为阳性研究标准时更是如此。约50%的急性胆囊炎患者有血流灌注增加和边缘征,约15%有显著血流灌注增加和显著边缘征。在急性胆囊炎患者中,仅有显著血流灌注增加或显著边缘征的患者是患有复杂性急性胆囊炎的患者。数据表明,急性胆囊炎患者中,边缘征或血流灌注增加的强度越大,胆囊病变的严重程度越高。(摘要截选至250字)