Suppr超能文献

非理性思维:一种新的特定学习障碍。

Dysrationalia: a new specific learning disability.

作者信息

Stanovich K E

机构信息

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1993 Oct;26(8):501-15. doi: 10.1177/002221949302600803.

Abstract

The concept of selective deficit is the foundation of most conceptual definitions of learning disability. Such definitions have tended to implicate the construct of intelligence in the conceptualization of learning disability and have led to the use of IQ test scores to operationalize the notion of aptitude-achievement discrepancy. The learning disabilities field is only beginning to grapple with the implications of its reliance on the concept of psychometrically defined intelligence. For example, discrepancy-based definitions of learning disabilities guarantee that such disabilities will become more or less prevalent depending on the comprehensiveness of the set of skills assessed on IQ tests. Unlike the vernacular concept of intelligence--which is quite broad--psychometric operationalizations reflect only a thin slice of the mental domain that might be considered cognitive. Thus, it is possible that we have not exhausted the potential set of discrepancy-based disabilities. As a demonstration proof, a new discrepancy-based disability category is proposed and defended in this paper. The disability is one that may force more careful consideration of the role that intelligence plays in conceptual and operational definitions of learning disabilities.

摘要

选择性缺陷的概念是大多数学习障碍概念性定义的基础。此类定义往往在学习障碍的概念化过程中涉及智力结构,并导致使用智商测试分数来操作能力-成就差异的概念。学习障碍领域才刚刚开始应对其对心理测量学定义的智力概念的依赖所带来的影响。例如,基于差异的学习障碍定义保证了此类障碍的流行程度将或多或少取决于智商测试所评估技能集的全面性。与相当宽泛的通俗智力概念不同,心理测量学操作仅反映了可能被视为认知的心理领域的一小部分。因此,我们有可能尚未穷尽基于差异的障碍的潜在范围。作为一个证明,本文提出并论证了一种新的基于差异的障碍类别。这种障碍可能会促使人们更仔细地考虑智力在学习障碍的概念性和操作性定义中所起的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验