• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Office systems for promoting screening mammography. A survey of primary care practices.

作者信息

Melville S K, Luckmann R, Coghlin J, Gann P

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1993 Dec;37(6):569-74.

PMID:8245808
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Office tracking, scheduling, and reminder systems have been shown to improve utilization of screening mammography, but little is known about the use of these systems by primary care physicians.

METHODS

We surveyed 132 primary care and obstetrics and gynecology practices affiliated with an independent practice association model health maintenance organization in central Massachusetts to determine their use of reminder, scheduling, and follow-up systems, and education and counseling services aimed at increasing screening mammography rates.

RESULTS

The use of chart flags to remind physicians of a patient's need for mammography screening was reported by 30% of practices. Thirty-one percent reported the use of flow sheets, and 27% reported the use of mail or telephone patient reminders. At least one of these three systems was used by 57% of the practices, whereas 43% reported having none of these three systems. Variations in the use of these office systems were related to specialty type, physician number, and clinical staffing. The majority of practices (77%) reported using written educational materials, and 42% offered prevention counseling with nonphysician staff. Very few offices (8%) reported using mail or telephone reminders for previously scheduled appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the proven effectiveness of reminder systems for screening mammography, many practices do not have a system in place. Promotion of reminder systems in primary care practices could have a substantial impact on mammography utilization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Office systems for promoting screening mammography. A survey of primary care practices.
J Fam Pract. 1993 Dec;37(6):569-74.
2
A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.一项旨在提高乳腺钼靶检查持续参与率的随机干预措施。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Sep;7(9):887-94.
3
Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.基于网络的主动式乳腺癌筛查改善系统:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 26;167(6):606-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.6.606.
4
Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: health assessment forms.提高对乳腺X线摄影建议的依从性:健康评估表。
J Fam Pract. 1993 Jan;36(1):59-64.
5
A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.三种针对性干预措施提高乳腺钼靶筛查率的成本效益比较。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004 Oct;13(8):909-18. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.909.
6
Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.科罗拉多州医疗专业人员对西班牙裔女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的态度。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):95-100.
7
Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.提高乳腺钼靶筛查建议的依从性:一项在初级保健诊所进行的临床试验。
Fam Med. 1995 Feb;27(2):117-21.
8
Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.使用患者提醒信促进女性癌症筛查服务:威斯康星州的一项基于人群的研究。
Prev Med. 1999 Sep;29(3):202-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0526.
9
Organizational systems used by California capitated medical groups and independent practice associations to increase cancer screening.加利福尼亚州的人头付费医疗集团和独立执业协会为增加癌症筛查所采用的组织系统。
Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2824-31.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.多次外呼促进低收入女性乳腺钼靶检查的有效性和成本效益
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Sep;9(9):923-31.