Shearer V E, Giesecke A H
Parkland Memorial Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Dallas, TX 75235.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Dec;77(6):1135-8. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199312000-00009.
Airway management in patients with penetrating neck trauma is controversial. We reviewed the records of 107 patients with penetrating neck trauma from 1989 through 1991 for primary intubation technique, mechanism of injury, zone of injury, and structures injured. Six patients (6%) received a surgical airway as the primary choice, 89 (83%) had direct laryngoscopies after rapid sequence induction of anesthesia, eight (7%) had awake fiberoptic bronchoscopies, and four (4%) had awake blind nasotracheal intubation. The success rates for primary surgical were 100%, fiberoptic 100%, direct laryngoscopy 98%, and blind nasal 75%. Two (2%) of the patients in the direct laryngoscopy group required a secondary emergency surgical airway. One failed blind nasal attempt (25%) resulted in the patient's death due to loss of airway during a secondary attempt at an emergency surgical airway. A second patient died as a result of hemorrhage not related to airway management. Success rates were not statistically different with any of the four airway management techniques chosen primarily. However, the one death in the awake nasal intubation group and the technical and time constraints of fiberoptic intubation cause us to prefer rapid sequence induction of anesthesia with direct laryngoscopy or a primary surgical airway in patients with penetrating neck trauma who need an emergency airway.
穿透性颈部创伤患者的气道管理存在争议。我们回顾了1989年至1991年间107例穿透性颈部创伤患者的记录,内容包括初次插管技术、损伤机制、损伤区域及受损结构。6例患者(6%)首选手术气道,89例(83%)在快速顺序诱导麻醉后行直接喉镜检查,8例(7%)接受清醒纤维支气管镜检查,4例(4%)接受清醒盲探经鼻气管插管。初次手术成功率为100%,纤维支气管镜检查为100%,直接喉镜检查为98%,盲探经鼻插管为75%。直接喉镜检查组中有2例患者(2%)需要二次紧急手术气道。一次盲探经鼻插管失败(25%)导致患者在二次尝试紧急手术气道时因气道丧失而死亡。另一名患者因与气道管理无关的出血死亡。主要选择的四种气道管理技术的成功率在统计学上无差异。然而,清醒经鼻插管组中的一例死亡以及纤维支气管镜插管的技术和时间限制,使我们更倾向于对需要紧急气道的穿透性颈部创伤患者采用快速顺序诱导麻醉联合直接喉镜检查或首选手术气道。