Schembri M A, Lin S K, Lambert J R
Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2621-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2621-2624.1993.
A number of serological tests measuring the presence of Helicobacter pylori-specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) are now commercially available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of five commercial H. pylori antibody tests: GAP-IgG (Biomerica), HELpTEST (AMRAD, Kew, Victoria, Australia), HELICO-G (Porton Cambridge), Pyloriset (Orion Diagnostica), and ROCHE (Roche Diagnostics). A total of 162 subjects presenting for routine upper endoscopy were studied. H. pylori was diagnosed if culture, histology, or both were positive. Ten milliliters of venous blood was collected at the time of endoscopy for serological assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of each test (GAP-IgG, HELpTEST, HELICO-G, Pyloriset, and ROCHE) were as follows: 83 and 79%, 92 and 77%, 86 and 65%, 89 and 56%, and 98 and 69%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 97 and 83%, 90 and 91%, 76 and 83%, 68 and 84%, and 86 and 97%, respectively. The specificity of most tests increased by approximately 10% when sera from subjects less than 45 years old were examined. The number of sera falling into the grey zone for each test (an indeterminate result with respect to H. pylori status) varied between 2.5 and 19%. This study highlights the need for all serological kits to be independently evaluated on the population to be studied by testing against a microbiologically defined panel of H. pylori-positive and -negative sera.
目前有多种检测幽门螺杆菌特异性血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)的血清学检测方法可供商业使用。本研究的目的是评估五种商用幽门螺杆菌抗体检测方法的临床准确性:GAP-IgG(Biomerica公司)、HELpTEST(AMRAD公司,位于澳大利亚维多利亚州基尤)、HELICO-G(Porton Cambridge公司)、Pyloriset(Orion Diagnostica公司)和ROCHE(罗氏诊断公司)。共对162名接受常规上消化道内镜检查的受试者进行了研究。如果培养、组织学检查或两者均为阳性,则诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染。在内镜检查时采集10毫升静脉血进行血清学评估。每种检测方法(GAP-IgG、HELpTEST、HELICO-G、Pyloriset和ROCHE)的敏感性和特异性分别如下:83%和79%、92%和77%、86%和65%、89%和56%、98%和69%。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为97%和83%、90%和91%、76%和83%、68%和84%、86%和97%。当检测45岁以下受试者的血清时,大多数检测方法的特异性提高了约10%。每种检测方法落入灰色区域(关于幽门螺杆菌状态的不确定结果)的血清数量在2.5%至19%之间。本研究强调,所有血清学检测试剂盒都需要通过与一组微生物学定义的幽门螺杆菌阳性和阴性血清进行检测,在待研究人群中进行独立评估。