Mangin-Lazarus C, Féline A
C.H.S. Paul Guiraud, Villejuif.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1993 Mar;151(3):209-16.
The study of a long neglected bill about the accused in a state of mental alienation debated by the legislative assembly of the french Directoire (1794-1799) following a ruling in the Joseph Firmin case. The parliamentary debate on this bill is of real historical interest, since for the first time after the french Revolution its thirteen sections propose to institute special proceedings in case of mental alienation, midway between the penal code of 1791, which does not contain such provisions and the napoleonic code of 1810, it opens the way for the wellknown section 64 of this later code which sets the rules for over a hundred and eighty years.
对一项长期被忽视的法案的研究,该法案涉及在约瑟夫·菲尔米纳案裁决后,由法国督政府(1794 - 1799年)立法议会辩论的处于精神错乱状态的被告。关于该法案的议会辩论具有真正的历史意义,因为自法国大革命后首次出现,其13个条款提议在精神错乱情况下设立特别程序,介于1791年不包含此类条款的刑法典和1810年的拿破仑法典之间,它为后一部法典著名的第64条开辟了道路,该条规定的规则延续了一百八十多年。