• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对听觉刺激的皮质反应进行单电流偶极子分析与磁场断层扫描分析的比较。

Comparison of single current dipole and magnetic field tomography analyses of the cortical response to auditory stimuli.

作者信息

Ioannides A A, Singh K D, Hasson R, Baumann S B, Rogers R L, Guinto F C, Papanicolaou A C

机构信息

Open University, Department of Physics, Milton Keynes, UK.

出版信息

Brain Topogr. 1993 Fall;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01234124.

DOI:10.1007/BF01234124
PMID:8260323
Abstract

Measurements of the magnetic field elicited by a 50 ms long auditory stimulus, from three normal subjects and one head injured subject, are used to estimate the three dimensional distribution of generators in the brain. The resulting images are compared with point source solutions obtained with the usual single current dipole fitting procedures, over a latency range which includes the extrema in the (average) measured signal. In all cases considered, 100 or so epochs time-locked to the stimulus were magnetically recorded. These were averaged, and then analyzed using two techniques; a new distributed current model known as Magnetic Field Tomography (MFT), and the standard single current dipole (SCD) model. Both methods provide estimates of the current generators in the brain. In two of the normal subjects, the MFT solutions are super-imposed onto Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) of the relevant cortical area. The results show that when the SCD model provides a reasonable description of the data, the MFT estimate shows one dominant localized region in agreement with the current dipole position. In the MFT sequence of solutions the activity evolves smoothly; multiple areas of activity often arise as the focal activity in one region declines while focal activity in another region grows. In contrast the SCD solutions during these intermediate periods fit the data poorly, and may move erratically from one locale to another. We conclude that MFT seems to provide a reasonable description of the activity through cortical and subcortical regions. The evolution of activity, as derived from the average signal, can be traced continuously from the onset of the stimulus, not just at the peaks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对三名正常受试者和一名头部受伤受试者施加时长50毫秒的听觉刺激所引发的磁场进行测量,以估计大脑中信号源的三维分布。将所得图像与通过常规单电流偶极子拟合程序获得的点源解进行比较,比较的潜伏期范围包括(平均)测量信号中的极值。在所有考虑的情况下,对100个左右与刺激锁时的时段进行了磁记录。对这些记录进行平均,然后使用两种技术进行分析:一种是称为磁场断层扫描(MFT)的新分布式电流模型,另一种是标准单电流偶极子(SCD)模型。两种方法都能提供对大脑中电流源的估计。在两名正常受试者中,将MFT解叠加到相关皮质区域的磁共振图像(MRI)上。结果表明,当SCD模型能合理描述数据时,MFT估计显示出一个与电流偶极子位置一致的主要局部区域。在MFT解的序列中,活动平稳演变;随着一个区域的局部活动下降而另一个区域的局部活动增加,常常会出现多个活动区域。相比之下,在这些中间时段,SCD解对数据的拟合较差,并且可能会从一个位置不规则地移动到另一个位置。我们得出结论,MFT似乎能合理描述皮质和皮质下区域的活动。从平均信号得出的活动演变可以从刺激开始就连续追踪,而不仅仅是在峰值处。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Comparison of single current dipole and magnetic field tomography analyses of the cortical response to auditory stimuli.对听觉刺激的皮质反应进行单电流偶极子分析与磁场断层扫描分析的比较。
Brain Topogr. 1993 Fall;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01234124.
2
Magnetic field tomography of cortical and deep processes: examples of "real-time mapping" of averaged and single trial MEG signals.皮质和深部神经活动过程的磁场断层扫描:平均和单次试验脑磁图信号“实时映射”的示例。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1995 Dec;20(3):161-75. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00031-3.
3
Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography.
Neuroimage. 2003 Jan;18(1):58-66. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1325.
4
Source analysis of magnetic field responses from the human auditory cortex elicited by short speech sounds.
Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(1):144-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00229864.
5
Measurements of auditory and somatically evoked magnetic fields and localization of their dipole sources.听觉和躯体感觉诱发磁场的测量及其偶极子源的定位。
Front Med Biol Eng. 1989;1(2):107-18.
6
Early (N70m) neuromagnetic signal topography and striate and extrastriate generators following pattern onset quadrant stimulation.模式起始象限刺激后早期(N70m)神经磁信号地形图以及纹状和纹外发生器
Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):702-18. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0735.
7
[Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].同步听觉诱发电位与功能磁共振记录在中枢听觉系统检查中的应用——初步结果
Otolaryngol Pol. 2011 May-Jun;65(3):171-83. doi: 10.1016/S0030-6657(11)70671-0.
8
The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.对极高频率音调的听觉诱发磁场。
Neuroscience. 2002;112(2):367-81. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00086-6.
9
Equivalent dipoles for middle latency auditory evoked potentials using the dipole tracing method.使用偶极子追踪法的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位等效偶极子
Auris Nasus Larynx. 1999 Jul;26(3):245-56. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(99)00011-5.
10
[Whole head measurement of auditory evoked magnetic field using a MR-linked helmet shaped MEG system].[使用与磁共振成像(MR)相连的头盔式脑磁图(MEG)系统进行听觉诱发磁场的全脑测量]
No To Shinkei. 1994 Jul;46(7):632-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Frontal and superior temporal auditory processing abnormalities in schizophrenia.精神分裂症的额颞听觉处理异常。
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 May 15;2:695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.002. eCollection 2013.
2
MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.使用快速 L1 最小范数的 MEG 源成像方法及其在具有脑噪声和人类静息状态源幅度图像的信号中的应用。
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:585-604. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
3
BA3b and BA1 activate in a serial fashion after median nerve stimulation: direct evidence from combining source analysis of evoked fields and cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.

本文引用的文献

1
Point and distributed current density analysis of interictal epileptic activity recorded by magnetoencephalography.
Physiol Meas. 1993 May;14(2):121-30. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/14/2/003.
2
Neuromagnetic fields evoked by a patterned on-offset stimulus.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985 Jun;32(6):455-8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1985.325455.
3
Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain.人类大脑中神经元活动的磁定位
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(22):8732-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8732.
4
正中神经刺激后,BA3b 和 BA1 依次激活:来自诱发电场源分析与细胞构筑概率图谱结合的直接证据。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):60-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.054. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
4
How can EEG/MEG and fMRI/PET data be combined?脑电图/脑磁图与功能磁共振成像/正电子发射断层扫描数据如何结合?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Sep;17(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10057.
5
A correlation study of averaged and single trial MEG signals: the average describes multiple histories each in a different set of single trials.平均和单次试验脑磁图信号的相关性研究:平均值描述了不同单次试验集中的多个历史情况。
Brain Topogr. 1996 Summer;8(4):385-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01186914.
6
Estimates of brain activity using magnetic field tomography in a GO/NOGO avoidance paradigm.
Brain Topogr. 1993 Spring;5(3):275-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01128994.
7
In vivo validation of distributed source solutions for the biomagnetic inverse problem.
Brain Topogr. 1993 Spring;5(3):263-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01128993.
Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Sep;65(5):344-60. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90014-6.
5
The brain's magnetic field: some effects of multiple sources on localization methods.大脑磁场:多个源对定位方法的一些影响。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Jan;63(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(86)90065-9.
6
Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures.
Exp Brain Res. 1990;80(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00228845.
7
Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging.使用脑磁图和磁共振成像对听觉反应源进行定位
Arch Neurol. 1990 Jan;47(1):33-7. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530010041016.
8
MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.使用植入人脑的源进行脑磁图(MEG)与脑电图(EEG)定位测试。
Ann Neurol. 1990 Dec;28(6):811-7. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280613.
9
Neuromagnetic somatosensory homunculus: a non-invasive approach in humans.
Neurosci Lett. 1991 Jan 2;121(1-2):51-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90647-c.
10
MEG versus EEG localization test.
Ann Neurol. 1991 Aug;30(2):222-4. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300220.