Suppr超能文献

软性膀胱镜检查比柱状透镜检查遗漏的肿瘤更多吗?

Does flexible cystoscopy miss more tumours than rod-lens examination?

作者信息

Walker L, Liston T G, LLoyd-Davies R W

机构信息

Department of Urology, St Thomas' Hospital, London.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1993 Oct;72(4):449-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16175.x.

Abstract

The first blind, prospective, randomised comparison of flexible cystoscopy with rod-lens cystoscopy was carried out on 53 consecutive volunteers with bladder tumours or haematuria. Three patients' recurrences were missed on flexible cystoscopy and 3 others on rod-lens examination. It was expected that the 9% rate of missed tumours would lessen with increased experience of flexible cystoscopy, as 2 of them occurred in the first 12 examinations and all of the lesions missed were < 5 mm in diameter. Rod-lens cystoscopy, the accuracy of which appears to have been measured for the first time, was no more sensitive.

摘要

对53名患有膀胱肿瘤或血尿的连续志愿者进行了首次灵活膀胱镜检查与棒状透镜膀胱镜检查的盲法、前瞻性、随机对照研究。灵活膀胱镜检查漏诊了3例患者的复发情况,棒状透镜检查漏诊了另外3例。预计随着灵活膀胱镜检查经验的增加,9%的肿瘤漏诊率会降低,因为其中2例发生在前12次检查中,所有漏诊的病变直径均<5毫米。棒状透镜膀胱镜检查的准确性似乎是首次测量,其敏感性并不更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验