Podivinský F, Jergelová M, Koncek V
Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Oct-Nov;33(7):427-31.
Double-shock bifocal peripheral nerves stimulation with varying interstimulus intervals (ISI) from 1 ms to 5000 ms was applied to healthy human subjects. Short (SLRs) and long latency reflexes (LLRs) from the slightly active first interosseus dorsalis muscle were recorded after an electrical conditioning stimulation of the index finger and test stimulation of the median nerve. It was found that with intervals from 1 to 5 ms the size of the SLR and LLRs after the second shock was unstable and almost oscillated around that evoked by a single shock, possibly due to transmitter depletion at these short ISIs. With intervals of 10 ms and longer, the test responses progressively increased: the SLR to 100 ms ISI, the LLR1 to 500 ms ISI and the LLR2 to 2000 ms ISI, probably due to temporal summation and some release of the transmitter substance after the conditioning cutaneous stimulus. All the recovery curves fully returned to the control value at 2000 ms and 3000 ms ISI, respectively. The main result is that cutaneous conditioning stimulation is not able to reduce or even to block the test SLR and LLRs. Interference phenomena did not occur between different afferents when paired stimulation was applied bifocally as the conditioning input in respect to a test nerve volley, was very limited. On the contrary, the test responses were far larger than the control response, probably due to some temporal summation with double-shock stimulation and because of the enhanced spinal excitability during slight voluntary contraction.
对健康人体受试者施加双冲击双焦点外周神经刺激,刺激间隔(ISI)从1毫秒到5000毫秒不等。在对食指进行电条件刺激和对正中神经进行测试刺激后,记录来自轻度活跃的第一背侧骨间肌的短潜伏期反射(SLR)和长潜伏期反射(LLR)。结果发现,当ISI为1至5毫秒时,第二次冲击后的SLR和LLR大小不稳定,几乎围绕单次冲击诱发的反应振荡,这可能是由于在这些短ISI下神经递质耗竭所致。当ISI为10毫秒及更长时,测试反应逐渐增加:SLR在ISI为100毫秒时增加,LLR1在ISI为500毫秒时增加,LLR2在ISI为2000毫秒时增加,这可能是由于时间总和以及条件性皮肤刺激后神经递质的一些释放。所有恢复曲线分别在ISI为2000毫秒和3000毫秒时完全恢复到对照值。主要结果是,皮肤条件刺激不能减少甚至不能阻断测试的SLR和LLR。当作为测试神经冲动的条件输入进行双焦点配对刺激时,不同传入神经之间未出现干扰现象,干扰非常有限。相反,测试反应远大于对照反应,这可能是由于双冲击刺激的一些时间总和以及轻微自主收缩期间脊髓兴奋性增强所致。