Suppr超能文献

人类四肢内部及四肢之间的感觉传入抑制。

Sensory afferent inhibition within and between limbs in humans.

作者信息

Bikmullina R, Bäumer T, Zittel S, Münchau A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):610-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the distribution and inter-limb interaction of short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) in the arm and leg.

METHODS

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in distal and proximal arm, shoulder and leg muscles induced with ranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were conditioned by painless electrical stimuli applied to the index finger (D2) and great toe (T1) at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 15, 25-35, 80 ms (D2) and 35, 45, 55, 65 and 100 ms (T1) in 27 healthy human subjects. TMS was delivered over primary motor cortex (M1) arm and leg areas. Electrical stimulus intensities were varied between 1 and 3 times the sensory perception thresholds. We also tested effects of posterior cutaneous brachial nerve (PCBN) stimulation on MEPs in arm muscles at ISIs of 18 and 28 ms.

RESULTS

D2 but not PCBN electrical conditioning reduced MEP amplitudes in upper limb muscles at ISIs of 25 and 35 ms. SAI was more pronounced in distal as compared to proximal arm muscles. Also, SAI following D2 stimulation increased with higher conditioning intensities. D2 stimulation did not change lower limb muscles MEPs. In contrast, T1 stimulation did not induce SAI in any muscles but caused MEP facilitation in a foot muscle at an ISI of 55 ms and in upper limb muscles at ISIs of 35 and 55 ms. Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were not affected by electrical T1 conditioning.

CONCLUSION

D2 stimulation causes segmental SAI in upper limb muscles with a distal to proximal attenuation without affecting leg muscles. In contrast, toe stimulation facilitates motor output both in foot and upper arm muscles.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data suggest that cutaneo-motor pathways in arms and legs are functionally organized in a different way with cutaneo-motor interactions induced by toe stimulation probably relayed at a thalamic level. Abnormal cutaneo-motor interactions following electrical toe stimulation may serve as an electrophysiological marker of thalamic dysfunction, e.g. in neurodegenerative diseases.

摘要

目的

研究手臂和腿部短潜伏期传入抑制(SAI)的分布及肢体间相互作用。

方法

在27名健康受试者中,经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发的远端和近端手臂、肩部及腿部肌肉的运动诱发电位(MEP),通过在15、25 - 35、80毫秒(针对食指[D2])以及35、45、55、65和100毫秒(针对大脚趾[T1])的刺激间隔(ISI)下,对食指(D2)和大脚趾(T1)施加无痛电刺激来进行条件设定。TMS作用于初级运动皮层(M1)的手臂和腿部区域。电刺激强度在感觉阈限的1至3倍之间变化。我们还测试了在18和28毫秒的ISI下,臂后皮神经(PCBN)刺激对手臂肌肉MEP的影响。

结果

在25和35毫秒的ISI时,D2而非PCBN的电刺激条件设定降低了上肢肌肉的MEP波幅。与近端手臂肌肉相比,SAI在远端更为明显。此外,D2刺激后的SAI随着更高的条件设定强度而增加。D2刺激未改变下肢肌肉的MEP。相反,T1刺激在任何肌肉中均未诱发SAI,但在55毫秒的ISI时,在一块足部肌肉中以及在35和55毫秒的ISI时,在上肢肌肉中引起了MEP易化。短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)和皮质内易化(ICF)不受T1电刺激条件设定的影响。

结论

D2刺激导致上肢肌肉出现节段性SAI,从远端到近端逐渐减弱,且不影响腿部肌肉。相反,脚趾刺激促进足部和上臂肌肉的运动输出。

意义

我们的数据表明,手臂和腿部的皮肤 - 运动通路在功能上以不同方式组织,脚趾刺激诱发的皮肤 - 运动相互作用可能在丘脑水平进行中继。电刺激脚趾后异常的皮肤 - 运动相互作用可能作为丘脑功能障碍的电生理标志物,例如在神经退行性疾病中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验