• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种骨髓移植急症评估工具的效度和信度

Validity and reliability of a bone marrow transplant acuity tool.

作者信息

Lovett R B, McMillan S C

机构信息

Outpatient Department, Hong Kong Adventist Hospital.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 1993 Oct;20(9):1385-92.

PMID:8265443
Abstract

The purpose of this project was to develop a valid and reliable patient-acuity tool for patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) as part of an overall patient-acuity system. A survey of other cancer centers and a review of the literature revealed no acuity tools that were designed for patients undergoing BMT. A four-level, nursing-diagnosis-based tool was developed with multiple indicators in each level, and its validity and reliability were studied. Content validity indexes (CVIs) were generated for each indicator by a panel of content experts. CVIs ranged from 0.4 to 1.0 with an overall CVI of 0.93 for the tool. Interrater reliability using two raters for 79 patients was high (r = 0.94, p < 0.001). Results of the study provide sufficient evidence of validity and reliability to warrant use of the tool, but further study is needed.

摘要

本项目的目的是开发一种有效且可靠的患者 acuity 工具,用于接受骨髓移植(BMT)的患者,作为整体患者 acuity 系统的一部分。对其他癌症中心的调查和文献回顾显示,没有专门为接受 BMT 的患者设计的 acuity 工具。开发了一种基于护理诊断的四级工具,每个级别都有多个指标,并对其有效性和可靠性进行了研究。内容专家小组为每个指标生成了内容效度指数(CVI)。CVI 的范围为 0.4 至 1.0,该工具的总体 CVI 为 0.93。使用两名评估者对 79 名患者进行的评估者间信度很高(r = 0.94,p < 0.001)。研究结果提供了充分的有效性和可靠性证据,证明该工具值得使用,但仍需进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of a bone marrow transplant acuity tool.一种骨髓移植急症评估工具的效度和信度
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1993 Oct;20(9):1385-92.
2
Validity and reliability of medical and surgical oncology patient acuity tools.医学与外科肿瘤学患者 acuity 工具的有效性和可靠性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Nov-Dec;21(10):1709-17.
3
Validity and reliability of an oncology critical care patient acuity tool.肿瘤重症护理患者 acuity 工具的有效性和可靠性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jul;22(6):967-71.
4
An evaluation of an acuity system as it applies to a cardiac catheterization laboratory.对一种应用于心脏导管实验室的 acuity 系统的评估。
Comput Nurs. 1999 May-Jun;17(3):129-34.
5
Validity and reliability of a pediatric hematology oncology patient acuity tool.儿科血液肿瘤患者病情严重程度评估工具的有效性和可靠性。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1991 Jul;8(3):122-30. doi: 10.1177/104345429100800305.
6
Validity and reliability of nursing workload measurement systems: review of validity and reliability theory.护理工作量测量系统的有效性和可靠性:有效性和可靠性理论综述
Can J Nurs Adm. 1996 Sep-Oct;9(3):32-50.
7
Patient dependency in the emergency department (ED): reliability and validity of the Jones Dependency Tool (JDT).急诊科患者依赖性:琼斯依赖性工具(JDT)的可靠性和有效性。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Oct;14(4):219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
8
Acuity systems dialogue and patient classification system essentials.敏锐度系统对话与患者分类系统要点。
Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Oct-Dec;31(4):284-99. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000290426.41690.cb.
9
Counter misleading data: adjust for patient acuity, indirect nursing hours.对抗误导性数据:针对患者病情严重程度、间接护理时长进行调整。
ED Manag. 1998 Mar;10(3):29-30.
10
Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.针对成年口腔插管重症患者的口腔护理实践调查的效度和信度。
Nurs Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;58(5):374-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181b4b3d1.