Shiffrin R, Ratcliff R, Murnane K, Nobel P
Department of Psychology, Indiana University Bloomington 47405.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Nov;19(6):1445-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1445.
B. B. Murdock and M. J. Kahana (1993a) presented a continuous memory version of the theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM) model; they claimed that this model predicts list-strength and list-length findings, including those reported by R. Ratcliff, S. E. Clark, and R. M. Shiffrin (1990) and K. Murnane and R. M. Shiffrin (1991a). This model is quite similar to one discussed by R. M. Shiffrin, R. Ratcliff, and S. Clark (1990), who rejected the model on the basis of its inability to predict both an absent or negative list-strength effect (when strength is varied by repetitions) and a present list-length effect. In this comment we elaborate the earlier discussion and demonstrate that the version of TODAM proposed by B. B. Murdock and M. J. Kahana (1993a) indeed fails for this reason. We show this first for a somewhat simplified version of the model for which derivations are obvious and then in a simulation of the complete version using the parameter values suggested by B. B. Murdock and M. J. Kahana (1993a).
B. B. 默多克和M. J. 卡哈纳(1993a)提出了分布式联想记忆理论(TODAM)模型的连续记忆版本;他们声称该模型能够预测列表强度和列表长度的研究结果,包括R. 拉特克利夫、S. E. 克拉克和R. M. 希夫林(1990)以及K. 穆尔南和R. M. 希夫林(1991a)所报告的结果。该模型与R. M. 希夫林、R. 拉特克利夫和S. 克拉克(1990)讨论的一个模型非常相似,后者基于该模型无法预测不存在或负面的列表强度效应(当强度通过重复变化时)以及存在的列表长度效应而拒绝了该模型。在本评论中,我们详细阐述了早期的讨论,并证明B. B. 默多克和M. J. 卡哈纳(1993a)提出的TODAM版本确实因此而失败。我们首先针对该模型的一个稍微简化的版本进行展示,其推导很明显,然后使用B. B. 默多克和M. J. 卡哈纳(1993a)建议的参数值对完整版本进行模拟展示。