Markey B K, McNulty M S, Todd D
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ballsbridge, Dublin, Ireland.
Vet Microbiol. 1993 Sep;36(3-4):233-52. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90091-k.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed and compared with the complement fixation test (CFT) and the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IIFAT) for the detection of antibodies to C. psittaci in sheep. Field sera and experimental sera from aborting ewes, subclinically infected sheep and vaccinated sheep were used. The ELISA and IIFAT were much more sensitive than the CFT. Agreement between the CFT and ELISA varied between 50% and 98%, while agreement between the IIFAT and ELISA varied between 70.5% and 94.3%. The specificity of IIFAT and ELISA with regard to the identification of animals which may be a source of ovine abortion strains of C. psittaci was critically assessed, using antigen preparations derived from an abortion isolate and from a non-abortion isolate of C. psittaci. Indirect immunofluorescence was shown to be the more discerning test.
开发了一种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),并将其与补体结合试验(CFT)和间接免疫荧光抗体试验(IIFAT)进行比较,用于检测绵羊中鹦鹉热衣原体抗体。使用了来自流产母羊、亚临床感染绵羊和接种疫苗绵羊的现场血清和实验血清。ELISA和IIFAT比CFT敏感得多。CFT与ELISA之间的一致性在50%至98%之间,而IIFAT与ELISA之间的一致性在70.5%至94.3%之间。使用源自鹦鹉热衣原体流产分离株和非流产分离株的抗原制剂,对IIFAT和ELISA在鉴定可能是绵羊流产型鹦鹉热衣原体菌株来源动物方面的特异性进行了严格评估。结果表明间接免疫荧光是更具鉴别力的试验。