Webb R K, Russell W J, Klepper I, Runciman W B
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):673-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100533.
Of the first 2000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study, 177 (9%) were due to "pure" equipment failure according to pre-defined criteria. Of these 107 (60%) involved anaesthetic equipment, 42 (24%) involved monitors, 17 (10%) other theatre equipment and 11 (6%) the gas or electricity supply. Ninety-seven (55% of the 177) were potentially life-threatening; of these two-thirds would be detected by the array of monitors recommended by the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and all but 9 of the remainder would be handled by application of the crisis management algorithm recommended elsewhere in this symposium. Of the 9 remaining, 2 were electrical shock, 3 overheating of a humidifier or blood warmer, 2 the unavailability of a spare laryngoscope and 1 the consequence of a power failure. Meticulous adherence to the equipment checking and monitoring guidelines of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists and application of a suitable crisis management algorithm should protect the patient from potentially life-threatening equipment failure in virtually all cases except electric shock, power failure and overheating of warming devices.
在向澳大利亚事件监测研究报告的最初2000起事件中,根据预先定义的标准,177起(9%)是由“纯粹的”设备故障引起的。其中,107起(60%)涉及麻醉设备,42起(24%)涉及监测仪,17起(10%)涉及其他手术设备,11起(6%)涉及气体或电力供应。97起(占177起的55%)可能危及生命;其中三分之二可通过澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院推荐的一系列监测仪检测到,其余除9起外,均可通过本次研讨会其他地方推荐的危机管理算法处理。在剩下的9起中,2起是电击,3起是加湿器或血液加温器过热,2起是备用喉镜无法使用,1起是停电的后果。严格遵守澳大利亚和新西兰麻醉师学院的设备检查和监测指南,并应用合适的危机管理算法,几乎在所有情况下都应能保护患者免受可能危及生命的设备故障影响,电击、停电和加温设备过热除外。