Takai A, Nakano M, Bando E, Hewlett E R
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Tokushima, School of Dentistry, Japan.
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Dec;70(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90262-m.
Accurate and repeatable methods for recording tooth contacts are required for the clinical management of problems related to occlusion. A thorough understanding of the materials and procedures used in these methods is important to achieve desirable results in the treatment of such problems. This study compared three occlusal examination methods to determine the influence of materials and procedures on the number of tooth contacts recorded. Tooth contacts were analyzed at two lateral mandibular positions with each method. It was found that the method that uses black silicone recorded the highest number of tooth contacts. Thus the most frequent type of occlusal pattern observed was full-balanced occlusion. This study suggested that the disparities of results reported in literature on occlusal contact patterns could be the result of the different materials and methods used for occlusal registration.
对于咬合相关问题的临床处理，需要准确且可重复的记录牙齿接触的方法。深入了解这些方法中使用的材料和步骤，对于在这类问题的治疗中取得理想效果至关重要。本研究比较了三种咬合检查方法，以确定材料和步骤对记录的牙齿接触数量的影响。每种方法在两个下颌侧方位置分析牙齿接触情况。结果发现，使用黑色硅橡胶的方法记录的牙齿接触数量最多。因此，观察到的最常见的咬合模式类型是全平衡咬合。本研究表明，文献中报道的咬合接触模式结果差异可能是由于用于咬合记录的材料和方法不同所致。
