Suppr超能文献

让内部市场发挥作用:管理变革的一个实例

Making the internal market work: a case for managed change.

作者信息

Moore L, Dalziel M

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

出版信息

BMJ. 1993 Nov 13;307(6914):1270-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6914.1270.

Abstract

The internal market in the NHS is meant to ensure that provider units compete on the basis of price and quality and that money follows patients into efficient units. But the example of what happened to one local ophthalmology unit suggests what may go wrong when entrepreneurial activity is applied in a market that does not work perfectly. In 1991-2 the unit had a high workload but also comparatively high prices (because of crude pricing in the local hospital); because of pressure of work the waiting times lengthened and general practitioners increasingly complained about the service. The staff in the unit reopened a longstanding debate about the need for a third consultant ophthalmologist, but neither the purchasers (including fundholders) nor the provider unit were able to fund the post. Fundholders in a neighbouring district, however, together with that district health authority, decided to place their contracts elsewhere for the following year. Although the withdrawal of contracts jeopardised the clinical and financial viability of the ophthalmic unit, patients continued to use the service. When general practitioners in the district realised that their local service might collapse they pressed to keep the service open. The fundholders and the host purchaser finally agreed to fund a third consultant and drew up standards for the service. As a result the waiting times fell and the service is now described as "excellent." Short term market decisions may have unforseen long term implications for services to patients. This needs to be addressed as part of the evolution of the reformed NHS.

摘要

国民保健制度(NHS)的内部市场旨在确保供应商单位在价格和质量的基础上展开竞争,使资金随着患者流向高效的单位。但一个地方眼科单位的遭遇表明,在一个并非完美运作的市场中应用企业活动时可能会出现什么问题。1991年至1992年期间,该单位工作量很大,但价格也相对较高(因为当地医院定价粗略);由于工作压力,等待时间延长,全科医生对该服务的抱怨越来越多。该单位的工作人员重新展开了关于是否需要第三位眼科顾问医生的长期争论,但购买方(包括基金持有者)和供应单位都无力为该职位提供资金。然而,邻近地区的基金持有者与该地区的卫生局决定次年将合同授予其他地方。尽管合同的撤销危及眼科单位的临床和财务可行性,但患者仍继续使用该服务。当该地区的全科医生意识到他们当地的服务可能会崩溃时,他们极力要求维持该服务的运营。基金持有者和主要购买方最终同意为第三位顾问医生提供资金,并制定了服务标准。结果,等待时间缩短了,现在该服务被描述为“卓越”。短期的市场决策可能会对患者服务产生意想不到的长期影响。在改革后的国民保健制度的发展过程中,这一问题需要得到解决。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Short termism in the NHS.英国国家医疗服务体系中的短期主义
BMJ. 1995 Sep 16;311(7007):703-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.703.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验