• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

战争伤员的损伤严重程度评分与住院时间——关联性及可能的选择偏倚的论证

Injury severity scoring and length of stay in hospital of war casualties--demonstration of an association and possible selection bias.

作者信息

Linn S, Linn R, Sheps S, Sarid M, Michaelson M, Geva H, Wiener M, Brandes J M, Revach M

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;22(5):905-10. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.5.905.

DOI:10.1093/ije/22.5.905
PMID:8282471
Abstract

The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is a widely used measure of anatomical injury. It is the sum of squares of the highest scores on the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) in each of the three most severely injured body regions. This study was designed to describe the relationship between ISS and length of stay (LOS) in hospital. The ISS was independently determined by four physicians who studied 491 war casualties, excluding dead on arrival and non-trauma patients. The study demonstrates non-linear and non-homogeneous relationships between ISS and LOS. Exclusion of fatalities resulted in biased (higher) estimates of LOS among those with ISS scores of 25-66. The patients could be grouped into five categories according to their maximal AIS (MAIS): (1) Slight injury--i.e. those with injuries appropriate for AIS scores 1 or 2 that lead to an LOS of median 5 days; (2) Moderate injury--i.e. those with injuries appropriate to AIS scores of 3, with an expected median LOS of 10 days; (3) Severe injuries--i.e. those with injuries appropriate to AIS scores of 4, with expected median LOS of about 17 days; (4) Very severe injuries--i.e. those with one injury appropriate to an AIS score of 5; and (5) Multiple severe injuries--those who are severely wounded in two or more body regions, i.e. those with two or more injuries appropriate to AIS scores of 5 and 4, with a median LOS of 39 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

损伤严重度评分(ISS)是一种广泛应用的解剖学损伤衡量指标。它是三个损伤最严重身体区域中,每个区域在简明损伤定级标准(AIS)上的最高评分的平方和。本研究旨在描述ISS与住院时间(LOS)之间的关系。ISS由四位医生独立确定,他们研究了491名战争伤员,排除了入院时已死亡和非创伤患者。该研究表明ISS与LOS之间存在非线性和非均匀关系。排除死亡病例导致ISS评分为25 - 66的患者的LOS估计存在偏差(偏高)。根据其最大AIS(MAIS),患者可分为五类:(1)轻伤——即那些损伤程度适合AIS评分为1或2的患者,其住院时间中位数为5天;(2)中度损伤——即那些损伤程度适合AIS评分为3的患者,预期住院时间中位数为10天;(3)重伤——即那些损伤程度适合AIS评分为4的患者,预期住院时间中位数约为17天;(4)极重伤——即那些有一处损伤程度适合AIS评分为5的患者;(5)多处重伤——即在两个或更多身体区域受重伤的患者,即那些有两处或更多损伤程度适合AIS评分为5和4的患者,住院时间中位数为39天。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Injury severity scoring and length of stay in hospital of war casualties--demonstration of an association and possible selection bias.战争伤员的损伤严重程度评分与住院时间——关联性及可能的选择偏倚的论证
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Oct;22(5):905-10. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.5.905.
2
Severe traffic injuries in the Helsinki Trauma Registry between 2009-2018.2009-2018 年赫尔辛基创伤登记处的严重交通伤害。
Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2946-2952. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Impact of Adapting the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-2005 from AIS-1998 on Injury Severity Scores and Clinical Outcome.适应 AIS-2005 对伤害严重程度评分和临床结果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):5033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245033.
4
[Correlation between survival time and severity of injuries in fatal injuries in traffic accidents].[交通事故致命伤中生存时间与损伤严重程度的相关性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 Nov-Dec;129(11-12):291-5.
5
Changing to AIS 2005 and agreement of injury severity scores in a trauma registry with scores based on manual chart review.改为 AIS 2005 和基于手工图表审查的创伤登记处损伤严重程度评分的协议。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.033. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
6
The impact of the AIS 2005 revision on injury severity scores and clinical outcome measures.AIS 2005 修订版对损伤严重度评分和临床结局测量的影响。
Injury. 2009 Sep;40(9):999-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
7
Specific abbreviated injury scale values are responsible for the underestimation of mortality in penetrating trauma patients by the injury severity score.特定的简明损伤定级(AIS)值导致损伤严重度评分低估穿透性创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2 Suppl 3):S384-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182287c8d.
8
The Injury Severity Score is unable to differentiate between poor care and severe injury.
J Trauma. 1996 Jun;40(6):944-50. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199606000-00013.
9
Same Abbreviated Injury Scale Values May Be Associated with Different Risks to Mortality in Trauma Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study Based on the Trauma Registry System in a Level I Trauma Center.相同的简明损伤定级量表分值可能与创伤患者的死亡率风险相关:一项基于一级创伤中心创伤登记系统的横断面回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;14(12):1552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121552.
10
Assessing injury severity in bicyclists involved in traffic accidents to more effectively prevent fatal bicycle injuries in Japan.评估交通事故中自行车骑行者的损伤严重程度,以更有效地预防日本的致命自行车伤害。
Med Sci Law. 2013 Oct;53(4):194-8. doi: 10.1177/0025802413481011. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Falls From Heights: A Retrospective Review of Roof Fall-Related Trauma.高处坠落:屋顶坠落相关创伤的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Feb 6;16(2):e53727. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53727. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Epidemiology and outcome of an acute kidney injuries in the polytrauma victims admitted at the apex trauma center in Dubai.迪拜顶级创伤中心收治的多发伤患者急性肾损伤的流行病学及预后情况
Acute Crit Care. 2023 May;38(2):217-225. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.00388. Epub 2023 May 25.