Critchfield T S
Department of Psychology, Auburn University, Alabama 36849.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):495-514. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-495.
The bias (B'H) and discriminability (A') of college students' self-reports about choices made in a delayed identity matching-to-sample task were studied as a function of characteristics of the response about which they reported. Each matching-to-sample trial consisted of two, three, or four simultaneously presented sample stimuli, a 1-s retention interval, and two, three, or four comparison stimuli. One sample stimulus was always reproduced among the comparisons, and choice of the matching comparison in less than 800 ms produced points worth chances in a drawing for money. After each choice, subjects pressed either a "yes" or a "no" button to answer a computer-generated query about whether the choice met the point contingency. The number of sample and comparison stimuli was manipulated across experimental conditions. Rates of successful matching-to-sample choices were negatively correlated with the number of matching-to-sample stimuli, regardless of whether samples or comparisons were manipulated. As in previous studies, subjects exhibited a pronounced bias for reporting successful responses. Self-report bias tended to become less pronounced as matching-to-sample success became less frequent, an outcome consistent with signal-frequency effects in psychophysical research. The bias was also resistant to change, suggesting influences other than signal frequency that remain to be identified. Self-report discriminability tended to decrease with the number of sample stimuli and increase with the number of comparison stimuli, an effect not attributable to differential effects of the two manipulations on matching-to-sample performance. Overall, bias and discriminability indices revealed effects that were not evident in self-report accuracy scores. The results indicate that analyses based on signal-detection theory can improve the description of correspondence between self-reports and their referents and thus contribute to the identification of environmental sources of control over verbal self-reports.
在一项延迟身份匹配样本任务中,研究了大学生关于所做选择的自我报告的偏差(B'H)和辨别力(A'),该偏差和辨别力是他们所报告的反应特征的函数。每个匹配样本试验包括两个、三个或四个同时呈现的样本刺激、1秒的保持间隔以及两个、三个或四个比较刺激。在比较刺激中总是有一个样本刺激被重现,在不到800毫秒内选择匹配的比较刺激会在抽奖中产生获得金钱的机会。每次选择后,受试者按下“是”或“否”按钮来回答计算机生成的关于该选择是否符合得分条件的询问。在不同实验条件下对样本和比较刺激的数量进行了操控。无论操控的是样本还是比较刺激,成功的匹配样本选择率都与匹配样本刺激的数量呈负相关。与之前的研究一样,受试者在报告成功反应时表现出明显的偏差。随着匹配样本成功的频率降低,自我报告偏差往往变得不那么明显,这一结果与心理物理学研究中的信号频率效应一致。这种偏差也难以改变,这表明除了信号频率之外还有其他有待确定的影响因素。自我报告辨别力往往随着样本刺激数量的增加而降低,随着比较刺激数量的增加而增加,这种效应并非归因于这两种操控对匹配样本表现的不同影响。总体而言,偏差和辨别力指标揭示了自我报告准确性得分中不明显的效应。结果表明,基于信号检测理论的分析可以改进对自我报告与其所指对象之间对应关系的描述,从而有助于识别对言语自我报告进行控制的环境来源。