Stahelski A, Patch M E
Psychology Department, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926.
J Soc Psychol. 1993 Oct;133(5):693-8. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713924.
The relation between sequential request influence strategies and social power was examined, using a social impact theory model of perception. It was predicted that a door-in-the-face (DITF) scenario would suggest a greater difference in power between a giver and seeker than a foot-in-the-door (FITD) scenario would. Two judgment studies using American students at two different universities measured the perceived power of two individuals, the favor giver and the favor seeker, in either the DITF or the FITD. In both studies, the subjects perceived a significantly greater power difference between the giver and the seeker in the DITF strategy than they did in the FITD.
利用一种社会影响感知理论模型,研究了连续请求影响策略与社会权力之间的关系。研究预测,与登门坎效应(FITD)情景相比,留面子效应(DITF)情景会表明给予者和寻求者之间的权力差异更大。两项针对两所不同大学的美国学生的判断研究,测量了在留面子效应或登门坎效应情景中,给予帮助者和寻求帮助者这两个人物的感知权力。在两项研究中,与登门坎效应策略相比,受试者都明显感知到留面子效应策略中给予者和寻求者之间的权力差异更大。