Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California.
Rady School of Management, University of California-San Diego.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul;107(1):41-55. doi: 10.1037/a0036626.
Power can be gained through appearances: People who exhibit behavioral signals of power are often treated in a way that allows them to actually achieve such power (Ridgeway, Berger, & Smith, 1985; Smith & Galinsky, 2010). In the current article, we examine power signals within interpersonal communication, exploring whether use of concrete versus abstract language is seen as a signal of power. Because power activates abstraction (e.g., Smith & Trope, 2006), perceivers may expect higher power individuals to speak more abstractly and therefore will infer that speakers who use more abstract language have a higher degree of power. Across a variety of contexts and conversational subjects in 7 experiments, participants perceived respondents as more powerful when they used more abstract language (vs. more concrete language). Abstract language use appears to affect perceived power because it seems to reflect both a willingness to judge and a general style of abstract thinking.
表现出权力行为信号的人通常会受到某种待遇,使他们能够真正获得这种权力(Ridgeway、Berger 和 Smith,1985;Smith 和 Galinsky,2010)。在本文中,我们研究了人际交流中的权力信号,探讨了使用具体语言还是抽象语言是否被视为权力的信号。因为权力会激活抽象思维(例如,Smith 和 Trope,2006),所以知觉者可能期望权力更高的人说话更抽象,因此会推断使用更抽象语言的说话者具有更高的权力。在 7 项实验中,参与者在各种情境和对话主题中发现,当被试者使用更抽象的语言(而不是更具体的语言)时,他们会认为被试者更有权力。抽象语言的使用似乎会影响感知到的权力,因为它似乎反映了评判的意愿和抽象思维的一般风格。